Laserfiche WebLink
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1988 <br /> <br />transactions during the period December of 1984 to October 1985 in (1) <br />dissolving the Ridgeway Hydro Fund and the establishing of an Electric Capital <br />Reserve Fund and (2) transferring surplus funds to the Sewer Bond Fund. <br />Accordingly, during the interim, in his reports, Electric Fund surplus has been <br />overstated by $683,999.00 and Sewer Fund surplus has been overstated by <br />$259,798.00. Reporting on this in writing, City Manager Brown recommended that <br />"To avoid any possibility of this recurring and to insure that the annual audit <br /> <br />is properly interpreted .... "" .... the auditor develop fund balance sheets. <br /> <br />This would insure that the fund balances completely track the audit figures <br />and, further the responsibility for developing both the audit and fund balance <br />sheets would rest with one person or firm, rather than having two persons or <br />entities involved." Mr. St. Lawrence agreed to develop and prepare said fund <br />balance sheets. Mr. Fitts then presented a tabulation entitled "SURPLUS <br />ANALYSIS - Budget to Actual",comparing fund surplus balances at June 30, 1988, <br />with amounts estimated in preparing the 1987-88 City Budget as well as in <br />preparing the 1988-89 City Budget. <br /> <br />City Manager Brown presented a Five-Year Financial Forecast of revenues and <br />expenditures and the status of the various funds, beginning with the current <br />1988-89 budget year and assuming no increases in current revenue sources or <br />rates, although Mr. Brown included in the report possible sources of additional <br />revenue, as listed in his 1988-89 budget message. The forecast computation was <br />based on historical financial data for the five years preceding the current <br />1988-89 fiscal year for expenditures, i.e., percentages of historical growth <br />applied to determine projected expenditure needs. As to t.he General Fund, <br />revenue was projected to be but 4.26% more in 1992-93 over 1988-89 (including <br />an item of $268,638.00 new tax revenue), whereas 1992-93 expenditures were <br /> <br /> <br />