My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 03/22/1988
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1988
>
Minutes 03/22/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2000 10:00:29 PM
Creation date
6/25/1999 2:18:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
3/22/1988
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 1988 <br /> <br />A number of citizens residing in the area of Salem and Sellers Streets appeared <br />before Council in support of their petition (signed by 29 persons) seeking (1) a <br />small playground facility for their neighborhood and (2) street lighting along <br />undeveloped Lavinder Street, which extends from Memorial Boulevard to Salem <br />Street. Having considered this petition in advance of this Council meeting, <br />City Manager Brown reported that Martinsville already exceeds standards adopted <br />by the National Recreation & Park Association used as a general guide in the <br />development of parks and, too, for the City to undertake to develop and maintain <br />a series of parks designed to serve small population areas would require a large <br />amount of funds and funding as well as establish a precedent difficult to <br /> <br />control. Mr. Brown also explained the City's general-but-unwritten policy <br /> \ <br /> <br />pertaining to installing street lighting (and electric service), whereby such <br />service is installed as properties develop along streets (e.g., along developed <br />residential streets, generally lighting is installed on every other pole). In <br />a prepared statement relating to this petition, Councilman Cole offered comments <br />and made observations, generally as follows: <br /> <br /> I. White it is helpful to have national standards as a guide for <br /> the development of parks and recreational facilities, the fact <br /> that Martinsville's total park system exceeds those same <br /> standards makes it easy for Council, should it choose, to <br /> reject this petition. <br /> <br /> II. According to these same standards, nevertheless, recreation <br /> programs and services are at their best when the principa! <br /> focus is in the natural neighborhood. <br /> <br /> III. For the neighborhood and the thirty-six children who live <br /> therein, the motivating factor for the petition is safety. <br /> <br /> IV. The reason the national standards don't fit this situation <br /> are the boundary lines for the natural neighborhood, viz., <br /> Memorial Boulevard, the Norfolk Southern Railway tracks, and <br /> an industrial access road. <br /> <br /> V. The expressed concern that (to grant petitioners' request for <br /> the neighborhood playground) an undesirable precedent would be <br /> established seems to indicate that Martinsville should adhere <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.