Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
meeting, but=~indicated their support <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br /> TUESDAY· MAY= 22 · 1990 <br />for the. approval ~'of the <br /> <br /> .Council-acknowledged a report'· from the 'Director of 'Finance <br /> regarding the=reworking of the "net local costs" worksheet which <br /> <br />is contained =~inthe-Budget. In response to a question by <br /> Councilman Cole, Finance Director Fitts explained that the State <br /> had imposed a cap of 8.7% on its funding of the retirement benefits <br /> for~theemployees of the Constitutional Offices. The City's basic <br /> rate is 10.18% (plus a 5% employee contribution). Mayor Oakes said <br /> that this matter should be addressed with the' local legislators, <br /> as the State=is not funding the Constitutional Offices properly. <br /> Councilman!.McClain,'-~referring to the net local costs worksheet, <br /> asked Mr~ Fitts! how'the Sheriff's Office could have been <br /> appropriated $103,086 in local funds and yet be projected to spend <br /> $148,181. Mr. Fitts replied that' the City Manager has the <br /> authority to transfer funds within a department's budget and that <br /> the.Sheriff'sOffice will not exceed its totalbudget for the 1989- <br /> 90.Fiscal Year. Expressing concerns regarding the increase in <br /> <br />~spendingof local funds without action on the part~of Council, and <br /> upon==motion, duly seconded, and by unanimous vote, Council moved <br /> that the Constitutional Officers must come before the Council to <br /> seek a supplemental appropriation if they are to spend more local <br /> <br /> funds than are budgeted. ~= II ~- <br /> <br /> Councilman McClain asked that House Bill~I~751,'~.,,St e Payments for <br /> · at !~ <br /> <br /> <br />