My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 02/27/1990
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990
>
Minutes 02/27/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2000 10:00:29 PM
Creation date
6/7/1999 10:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/27/1990
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I wish to add that the Administration in no way guided, advised <br />or influenced the shopping mall developers to prepare maps show- <br />ing areas to be leased for the Mall or land to be subleased to <br />other en'tities as a part of the Mall development. Keyin Reed, <br />City Planner, and Joel Baker, Building Official, presumably <br />found out about the maps that had been prepared and recorded for <br />lease purposes from Jim Ford. I am advised by our Planner and <br />the Building Official that a general statement was made to Jim <br />Ford (in response to his inquiry) that apparently the developer <br />and Clerk did not consider that these maps would require <br />approval of the Planning Commission since a statement was on the <br />maps stating that they were for lease purposes only and not <br />considered a subdivision requiring Planning Commission approval. <br />I did not know that any such maps were recorded until I read the <br />letter from Ford to City Council. <br /> <br />I would reiterate, the Building Permits were issued based on the <br />original tracts as being a single land area or lot as defined <br />under the Zoning Ordinance and, therefore, we did not consider <br />the Subdivision Ordinance at all in the processing of this <br />entire matter. Hence, I cannot see how the Subdivision Ordi- <br />nance was violated by the Staff. <br /> <br />Even though the Administration was not involved or concerned <br />with the maps prepared for lease purposes, I would, however, <br />like ~o call your attention to 15.1-473 (c) and (e) Of the Code <br />of Virginia: <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br />No person shall sell or transfer any land of a sub- <br />division, before such plat has been duly approved <br />and recorded as provided herein, unless'such subdi- <br />vision was lawfully'created prior to the adoption of <br />a subdivision ordinance applicable thereto, provid- <br />ed, that nothing herein contained shall be construed <br />as preventing the recordation of the instrument by <br />which such land is transferred or the passage of <br />title as between the parties to the instrument. <br /> <br />Apparently this permits the recording of an instrument by which <br />land is transferred or the passage of title without subdividing <br />land by approved map. The recorded plats are referred to in the <br />lease as an actual part of the lease (even though recorded in a <br />Map Book). In view of the difficulty of the Clerk recording a <br />map as an attachment to the lease the Clerk added a statement to <br />the first recorded lease of the Mall area as follows: <br /> <br />For plat of survey, refer to "Plat of Survey for <br />DevelOpers. Diversified" last revised April 16, 1987, <br />prepared by J. A. Gustin and Associates, P.E. & L.L.S., <br />which was attached to and made a part of the foregoing <br />memorandum of lease by reference, see Map Book 18, Page <br />46, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit <br />Court for the City of Martinsville, Virginia. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.