My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda 02/23/1999
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Agendas
>
1999
>
Agenda 02/23/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2000 10:00:29 PM
Creation date
4/1/1999 7:16:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/23/1999
City Council - Category
Agendas
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TUESDAY. JANUARY 26. 1999 <br /> Council next considered the need to conduct a public hearing and consider approval, on <br /> <br />first reading, of Ordinance No. 99-1 on a request by the Planning Commission to amend Section <br /> <br />II--Definitions and Section XI--District Regulations-Professional District, Paragraph J-- <br /> ; <br /> <br />Permitted Uses-RP-1 Residential-Professional District, Sub-paragraph 4--Life Care Facility, of <br />the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Wayne Knox, Planning, Zoning and Housing Manager, spoke <br />on this issue, stating that the proposed change was an effort to effectively address the need for <br />assisted living facilities in the City. He stated that there was currently no adequate definition of <br />such facilities in the Code, and there would be more requests for placement of such facilities in <br />the future. He went on to say that the Planning Commission had approved a definition and made <br />allowance for such facilities in residential and professional districts. Further discussion then <br />took place among Council and staff concerning various issues related to the proposed change, <br />including impact on surrounding properties, other permitted uses in the same districts, tax value <br />impact, buffering between properties, examples viewed in other localities, responses from <br />residents concerning the proposed change, and the fact that the change proposed would create a <br />primarily administrative review of the siting of such facilities in the future, unless a special use <br />permit requirement was added.. The Public Heating was then opened. Mrs. Pinkard asked if the <br />proposed change was in response to a specific proposed project, and was told that it was not. <br />There were no other speakers and the heating was closed. Vice-Mayor Teague commented that <br />the inclusion of a Special Use Permit requirement would provide for more public input on the <br />siting of such facilities in the future. Council Member Roop clarified the fact that all that was <br />being asked of Council on this occasion was a change in the definition of such facilities, and that <br />they could come back later to modify the process for approval, if needed. Vice-Mayor Teague <br />still had concem about this issue, and moved to adopt the Ordinance as written, with the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.