Laserfiche WebLink
172 <br /> <br />TUESDAY, JUNE 11. 1996 <br /> <br />Council conducted a public hearing on the City's budget for fiscal year <br />1996-97, including the establishment of tax rates for FY 96-97. The <br />following persons made comments: (1) in response to a question by <br />Thelma Pinkard, 208 Park Street, Finance Director Richard D. Fitts <br />stated the total education budget was $17,094,061, a $1.2 million <br />increase over the current year; (2) in response to a question from <br />Gloria Hylton, 402 Second Street, City Manager Earl B. Reynolds, Jr. <br />stated the FY 96-97 budget contained $50,000 in the Capital Reserve <br />Fund for curb & gutter projects; Mr. Reynolds also stated that Street <br />Maintenance funds could now be used for such projects; (3) in response <br />to a question from Pat Walmsley, the Mayor noted consideration of <br />approval of the FY 96-97 was occurring somewhat later than in past <br />years due to delays in certain information being provided to Council; <br />(4) Jo Arnold, stating that she represented the teachers at <br />Martinsville High School, spoke in support of teacher salaries and <br />technology improvements as well as free tuition for the children of <br />non-City resident School personnel; and (5) Sheriff Steve Draper <br />commended the Administration for its work on the budget. There being <br />no other comments from persons present, Mayor Adams declared the public <br />hearing closed. Vice-Mayor Oakes suggested that next year a review of <br />the budget be presented at the time of the public hearing. Council <br />announced it would meet at 7:45 A.M. on June 19, 1996 to consider <br />approval of the budget and to consider appointments to the School <br />Board. The City Manager detailed over $9,000 in increases which would <br />be made to the Sheriff's budget for FY 96-97 to fund the relocation of <br />the Sheriff's administrative offices. Mr. Reynolds stated that these <br />increases would be more than offset by increases in State revenues, <br />therefore, the projected General Fund unexpended fund balance would be <br />larger than anticipated. <br /> <br /> <br />