Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:44 <br /> <br />TUESDg <br /> <br />JUNE 22. 1954 <br /> <br />turning around at this intersection and because of the <br />narrowness of the pavement and parking congestion in <br />this area, a traffic hazard is created. <br /> <br />2. The property on both sides of this new street dedication <br />is owned by Sale Knitting Company and therefore does not <br />constitute the opening of a new street in a new subdivision. <br /> <br />The above recommendation is respectfully submitted to Council for <br />its further consideration. <br /> <br />In accepting the following report from the Planning Commission on the rezoning <br /> <br />petition presented by Mr. Preston R. Graham on May 11, 1954, Council denied <br /> <br />said petition on the grounds outlined in said report: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting on June 17, 1954, <br />consider a petition referred to it by City Council from Hr. <br />Preston R. Graham, requesting the rezoning of a lot on Figsboro <br />Road. <br /> <br />After due consideration of this request the Planning Commission <br />voted unanimously to recOImnend to Council the denial of this <br />petition. <br /> <br />In making the above recommendation, the Planning Commission con- <br />sidered ~~e following facts: <br /> <br />1. That this request constitutes a request for spot zoning. <br /> <br />2. Tne PlaP~ing Commission does not feel that there is a <br />need in this particular area for further B-1 zoning. <br /> <br />3. The Planning Commission has more-or-less adopted a <br />policy throughout the City of denying all requests for <br />spot zoning. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission respectfully submits the above recommendation <br />for your further consideration. <br /> <br />Because of the apparent confusion between the City's street acceptance requirements <br /> <br />and its street paving requirements on the part of the petitioners requesting the <br /> <br />paving of Pond and Minor Streets (see minutes of June 8, 1954), Council <br />requested its Clerk to clarify these matters by letter to the developers of <br /> <br />property on said streets. <br />