Minutes 04/14/1964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

21 TUESDAY APRIL 14. 1964 ,- reimburse the customer in an amount equal to the material saving to the Uti2-ity because of the underground installation. If at any time the Utility needs to replace a pole which under- ground conduit is supported by, the customer shall be notified of the time and he shall have his elc,ctricians on hand to take care of the service while pole replacement is being made. - RULES & REGULATIO~S: Section 2 (b): Relays and Connections. Patrons of the Electric Department must install, at their own expense, approved reverse phase relays on all alternating current motors for elevators and hoists. The City shall not be responsible for any damages, whatsoever, if caused by a reversal of current, unless the reversal of current is a direct result of negligence on the part of the Electric Department or its employees. In areas served by overhead lines where a customer in such area desires that the service be run underground from the pole to the building, such customer shal install the service equipment only upo~ authorization of and under the supervision of the Electric Department and, furthermore, such installation shall be made and, also, maintained by the customer at his own expense. The Utility will, upon request, reimburse the customer in an amount equal to the material saving to the Utility because of the underground LlStallation. City Manager Hirst informed Council that customarily and for some years growers of produce, etc., as defined in Section 22 of Chapter II of the City's Business & Occupational License Tax Code, have been permitted to sell their produ::ts from vehicles parked on the City's Fayette Street Parking Lot because therc,; is no public market place in the City. Recently, a peddler-- ~ of whom there is required a license tax--has also parked his vehicle on this lot and offered for sale his purchased products and wishes to continue doing so; however, Council expressed the opinion that only properly certificated- growers should be allowed to use this lot for marketing their products. Meanwhile, Cou~cil continued this matter for further consideration. - I Councilman Burch, referring to the new Zoning Code recently enacted and referring to the complaint of Mr. Charlie M. Finney recorded in Council's minutes of April 2, 1964, indicated that it was his understanding that it