My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 10/28/1975
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1975
>
Minutes 10/28/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2006 2:58:33 PM
Creation date
12/11/2006 2:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
10/28/1975
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
View images
View plain text
<br />. (' H <br />LUV <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />OCTOBER 28, 1975 <br /> <br />First, I am very concerned with the Water and Sewer Fund revenue and <br />expense projections. In June Council outvoted me 4 to 1 and <br />elected to transfer $47,000.00 from the Water and Sewer Funds in <br />order to pay for operating expenses and balance the budget. I <br />objected to the transfer, and have voiced my objections, on at <br />least four occasions, for the following reasons: <br /> <br />(1) Assuming Mr. George Brown's five year revenue-and-expense <br />estimates are correct, the City can complete four projected capital <br />projects by 1980 without borrowing. If funds are transferred out <br />of surplus the City may have to borrow money to complete the <br />projects. In addition, it is possible that Council may elect, <br />in the future, to divert some of the surplus for other capital <br />expenditures such as the thoroughfare street program, recreation <br />or CBD. <br /> <br />(2) The City has a deficit in the Sewer Bond Fund of $452,076.00 <br />which, sooner of later, must be retired. <br /> <br />(3) I was concerned that by transferring Water and Sewer Funds <br />to the General Fund we would be setting a dangerous precedent. <br />Once we began making the transfer it would be difficult to <br />stop it from year to year because we would need to find the <br />money from another source to transfer to the General Fund. <br />Also, I was concerned that, once the door was opened, the <br />same mistakes that were made in the Electric Department would <br />be repeated. <br /> <br />The City had a surplus in the Electric Department of $610,766.00 <br />on June 30, 1971 to be used for capital expansion, replacement <br />and reserve for contingencies of the system. The actual surplus <br />of the Electric Department on June 30, 1975, according to Ford, <br />Hogg and Cobbe was only $64,249.00. The main reason the surplus <br />dropped to such a low level is because each year, for the last <br />four years, the net profits of the Electric Department, which <br />were budgeted for transfer to the General Fund, were <br />over-estimated by a total of $458,503.00, $6,677.00 in Fiscal <br />'72, $63,181.00 in '73, $214,627.00 in '74 and $174,018.00 in <br />'75. Because of this, Council was forced to use $458,503.00 <br />of Electric Department Surplus in order to balance the budget. <br /> <br />In my opinion, Mr. Yeaman's October 22nd quarterly financial <br />summary reflects the fact that, if present trends continue, the <br />surplus of the Water and Sewer Funds will be depleted by <br />$80,599.00 due to over-estimating the profits of the Water and <br />Sewer Funds. <br /> <br />The 1976 Budget includes a transfer of $60,081.00 from the <br />Water and Sewer Funds to the General Fund. The figure is <br />$13,081.00 greater than the $47,000.00 approved by Council, and <br />it represents Mr. George Brown's forecasted net profit of the Water <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).