My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 10/28/1975
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1975
>
Minutes 10/28/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2006 2:58:33 PM
Creation date
12/11/2006 2:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
10/28/1975
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />OCTOBER 28, 1975 <br /> <br />and Sewer Funds. Mr. Yeaman's October 22nd summary shows that for <br />the first quarter Water Fund consumer sales are running 5.8% below <br />budget estimates and sewer service charges are 8.5% below budget <br />estimates. If current trends continue, both funds will show an <br />operating deficit of $20,518.00 for the year, instead of a <br />projected profit of $60,081.00, and Council will be forced to <br />deplete the Water and Sewer Fund surplus accounts by $80,599.00, <br />the sum of the $20,518.00 deficit and the $60,081.00 transfer <br />to the General Fund. And this is exactly what happened to the <br />Electric Department Surplus. In my opinion, Council must act <br />now to preserve the strength of the City's utility funds. I <br />feel it is not fiscally sound to make future generations borrow <br />money for capital expansion and improvements because today's <br />citizens used money set aside for these purposes to live on. <br /> <br />Now, I would like to comment on the Electric Department. In <br />June, Mr. Corekin estimated that the City will purchase <br />approximately 15 percent more kilowatt hours in 1976 than in <br />1975. At that time I argued that Mr. Corekin's sales projections <br />might be overly optimistic when compared to other forecasts <br />throughout the proposed city budgets. After a great deal of <br />discussion, I moved and Council voted 3-2 to take a conservative <br />approach and budget a transfer of $485,000.00 from the Electric <br />Department to the General Fund, even though Council realized <br />that if Mr. Corekin's sales forecasts materialized and if <br />optimistic assumptions regarding the cost of purchased power <br />from Apco proved correct, the potential net profit of the <br />Electric Department could be greater than $485,000.00. <br />Council voted to take the conservative approach for two <br />reasons: <br /> <br />(1) To set aside a reasonable safety margin to guard against <br />another potential forecasting error. (The profits of the <br />Electric Department had been over-estimated for the past <br />four years). And (2) to hopefully provide the Electric <br />Department with a badly needed addition to surplus. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeaman's October 22nd figures verify that Council's <br />conservative approach was correct. For the first three <br />months kilowatt hour sales have increased ~ of 1%, far <br />below Mr. Corekin's estimate of 15%. Mr. Yeaman projects <br />that if current trends continue yearly gross sales of power <br />will fall short of the budget estimate by 10.3%. <br /> <br />However, the projected net profit figures are still above <br />the scheduled transfer of $485,000.00 from the Electric <br />Department to the General Fund because Council cautiously <br />revised Mr. Corekin's sales estimates downward. <br /> <br />,10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.