Laserfiche WebLink
<br />50 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />- <br />NOVEMBER l4~ 1978 <br /> <br />followed by regulatory rate-making bodies~ to obtain a fair price (i.e., through rate <br /> <br />tariffs) for its product, viz., electric energy. Elaborating further~ Mr. Vaughan noted <br /> <br />that APCo's investment tripled in value between 1967 and 1977 (from $570 million to <br /> <br />$1,519 million, respectively) whereas its capacity to meet peak demands only doubled (from <br /> <br />2 million KW to slightly over 4 million KW)~ with the average investment cost having been <br /> <br />$109.00 per KW in 1967 whereas, with the completion of a new generating plant (in West <br /> <br />Virginia) in 1981~ the investment cost will rise to $485.00 per KW. The need to proceed <br /> <br />with constructing more generating facilities~ Mr. Vaughan cited~ is urgent in order to <br /> <br />avoid shortages predicted for the early 1980's, inasmuch as the area served by APCo not <br /> <br />only is growing but APCo's customers are using more electric energy. For example, APCo's <br /> <br />retail customers in 1967 used less than an average of 6~000 kwhrs. per year but now are <br /> <br />using in excess of 10,000 kwhrs. annually; and in 1968 APCo had 31,500 customers with <br /> <br />electrically-heated homes whereas, currently~ it has l50~000 such customers, Total usage of <br /> <br />electric energy by APCo's 545,000 customers in 1968 was 10,6 billion kilowatthours, In 1977~ <br /> <br />APCo had 688~000 customers using 17.6 billion kilowatthours. Meanwhile~ in addition to other <br /> <br />rising operating costs~ APCo's 1967 cost for coal was $4.41 per ton, compared with $29.04 per <br /> <br />ton in 1977. Over the next few years, Mr. Vaughan stated, APCo will have to spend over one <br /> <br />billion dollars if it is to meet increasing energy needs but its ability to finance this <br /> <br />amount of construction hinges upon attracting investors in a most competitive money market~ <br /> <br />upon its earnings return, and upon rate "relief". In further statements and in response to <br /> <br />a direct inquiry~ Mr. Vaughan assured the City that APCo would attempt to meet the City of <br /> <br />Martinsville's electric energy requirements and that~ if at any time a curtailment throughout <br /> <br />APCo's system becomes necessary~ curtailment would apply in the manner set forth in the present <br /> <br />agreement between APCo and the City of Martinsville. Meanwhile~ Mr. Vaughan recommended that <br /> <br />the City evaluate all facets of the City's proposed hydro-electric project, i.e.~ make its <br /> <br />own decision thereon, with the assurance that APCo will in no way become involved at any <br />