Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br />ok <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />DECEMBER 22, 1981 <br /> <br />2. Two certified copies of this Resolution, the publisher's <br />affidavit of publication of the notice of public hearing <br />on the proposed amendments to Chapters 1, 6, and 13 of the <br />City Charter and the proposed amendments to the City Charter, <br />in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall be trans- <br />mitted to the City's representatives in the General Assembly; <br />and <br /> <br />3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. <br /> <br />Council unanimously placed on first reading certain proposed amendments to Chapters <br /> <br /> <br />1, 2, and 3 of the City Code. <br /> <br />Pursuant to action taken by Council at its December 8th meeting, City Attorney Worthy <br /> <br /> <br />presented proposed amendments (in the form of a re-writing) to the CATV (i.e., <br /> <br /> <br />cablevision) franchise ordinance, which franchise is now held by Multi-Channel T. V. <br /> <br /> <br />Cable Company of Mansfield (Ohio), trading as Martinsville Cablevision, by <br /> <br /> <br />incorporating therein (by reference) the present franchisee's "Proposal for a <br /> <br /> <br />Broadband Communication System for the City of Martinsville, Virginia", by <br /> <br /> <br />incorporating therein a specified pole attachment rental fee (applicable to City- <br /> <br /> <br />owned poles, which fee and attachment conditions heretofore have been set forth in a <br /> <br /> <br />separate document), by incorporating therein certain new charges for expanded <br /> <br /> <br />services, connections, and installations, and providing for the extending of the <br /> <br />life of the present franchise by fifty-nine (59) months. Following a discussion by <br /> <br /> <br />members of Council of the proposed amendments, including inquiries concerning whether <br /> <br /> <br />the franchise ordinance should specify that the office location of Martinsville <br /> <br /> <br />Cablevision be within the City's corporate limits, whether the density requirement <br /> <br /> <br />for service availability should be changed, and what--if any--should be required of <br /> <br /> <br />the franchisee for underground installations, Mr. Harry G. Copenhaver, Jr., as <br /> <br /> <br />President of Henry County Telecom, Inc., (a former subsidiary of Southern Telecom, of <br /> <br /> <br />Peachtree City, Georgia), appeared before Council and presented a written statement <br /> <br /> <br />in which, among other things, he reviewed events leading to the recent awarding by the <br /> <br /> <br />Henry County Board of Supervisors of a cablevision franchise to Southern Telecom to <br /> <br /> <br />serve Henry County citizens and Southern Telecom's subsequent decision not to accept <br /> <br /> <br />the awarded franchise, with Mr. Copenhaver requesting--as Southern Telecom requested <br /> <br />of Council on October 13, 1981--that Council "do nothing at the moment, and give us a <br /> <br /> <br />chance (-------------------_________________________________________________________) <br />