Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~, <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />AUGUST 11, 1981 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />In connection with City Manager Edmonds' proposed Water Resources Conservation <br /> <br />Plan formally introduced at Council's July 28th meeting, several citizens <br /> <br />present spoke to this matter, among whom were: <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />1. an unidentified citizen who inquired as to the present schedule <br />of dates, predicated upon continuing emergency conditions, on <br />which the several stages of the plan are scheduled to be invoked; <br />2. Mrs. Dori Blitz, of 114 Emmett Street, who--in a prepared <br />statement--alleged that (a) the surcharges proposed in the City <br />Manager's Water Resources Conservation Plan are punitive, <br />particularly for the small user, and will not resolve the water <br />shortage; (b) the present Federal Government administration <br />intends to abolish the national Water Resource Council, a move <br />contrary to the need to develop ana implement a nationwide water <br />resource plan; (c) City Council and local large water users are <br />evading possible solutions to the current water shortage by their <br />concern for continued production and employment and their lack of <br />concern for local residential customers; (d) Sale Knitting Company, <br />the largest user of City water, has not publically indicated its <br />cooperation toward conserving water; and (d) City Council is <br />resorting to a crisis-management approach to the current water <br />water shortage, although recognition was given to the fact that <br />long-term measures are being taken to prevent future water supply <br />shortages in the event drought conditions occur in the future; and <br />3. Mr. Patrick W. Ephriam, of 1159 Yorkshire Place, who urged that <br />Council place all emphasis on the current water emergency (rather <br />than intermingle therewith efforts toward solving long-term water <br />needs), meanwhile advocating the increasing of the proposed <br />surcharges, the conserving of water by everybody, and the <br />continuation of full production and full employment among local <br />industries. Subsequently, on the action taken by Council in <br />invoking (on a voluntary basis) subsections 1-through-7 of "Condition <br />2-A" of the Water Resources Conservation Plan, Mr. Ephriam contended <br />that no exceptions thereto should be made. <br /> <br />Upon motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Council declared said <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />subsections 1-through-7 of "Condition 2-A" of said Plan, as set forth in the <br /> <br />minutes of Council's meeting held July 28, 1981, as being immediately in effect <br /> <br />on a voluntary basis, excluding from the requirements of subsection 2 thereof <br /> <br />local commercial enterprises (such as commercial car-wash establishments, etc.). <br /> <br />Meanwhile, City Manager Edmonds took exception to a recently-published statement <br /> <br />criticizing Council and the City administration for an alleged lack of planning <br /> <br />for the development of water resources, with Mr. Edmonds noting that a review <br />