Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f68 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 13, 1984 <br /> <br />Treasurer's and Finance Department's records, (2) accounting records or procedures now <br /> <br />required by the State Auditor of Public Accounts, and (3) the Treasurer's accountability. <br /> <br />Mr. Bouldin concluded his response by stating, "I feel that I have endeavored to insure <br /> <br />an adequate safeguard of the City of Martinsville's cash assets. I feel that my records <br /> <br />are correct. I will be happy to comply with steps deemed necessary to continue to in- <br /> <br />sure the safeguard of our cash assets." Councilman Oakes, however, expressed deep con- <br /> <br />cern (as did other members of Council) over the fact that some of the auditors' findings <br /> <br />were the same as have been cited in prior years' audit reports and that little has been <br /> <br />done toward instituting procedures to comply with certain recommendations concerning the <br /> <br />operation of the Treasurer's office, with Councilman Oakes concluding that early com- <br /> <br />pliance is a "must". <br /> <br />City Manager Edmonds presented a written analysis relating to estimated year-end (i.e., <br /> <br />for the year ended June 30, 1984) surpluses projected for the City's major funds for <br /> <br />the beginning of the City's 1984-85 budget year in comparison with the findings of the <br /> <br />audit for the year ended June 30, 1984, noting that in the preparation of annual budgets-- <br /> <br />a process which begins several months before the end of a fiscal year--revenues for the <br /> <br />current year are conservatively estimated whereas expenditures may be projected more in <br /> <br />parallel with appropriations, with the result that projected year-end surplus balances <br /> <br />are normally less than audited actual balances. Through a combination of these factors, <br /> <br />City Manager Edmonds reported that, in these major funds and from audit findings, the <br /> <br />City's financial condition at June 30, 1984, was considerably better than estimated for <br /> <br />the budget year which began July 1, 1984. Mr. Edmonds' reconciliation and comparison <br /> <br />of the audit findings with budgeted estimates follows: <br />