Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C) i) <br />J,'/ <br /> <br />TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 1987 <br /> <br />Mr. Robert St. Lawrence. CPA, of Ford, Hogg & Cobbe, CPA's, appeared before <br /> <br />Council and formally presented a report on his firm's audit of the City's <br /> <br />financial records and accounts for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1987; and, as <br /> <br />pointed out by City Manager Brown. the only exception taken by the auditors in <br /> <br />the report was the City's method of recording purchases considered as fixed <br /> <br />assets, which method has since been revised to conform to the auditor's <br /> <br />recommendations, according to Mr. Brown. Council was also informed that other <br /> <br />problems heretofore cited in prior audit reports have been satisfactorily <br /> <br />resolved or corrected. In accepting the report, Council suggested that future <br /> <br />reports include a schedule comparing estimated fund (surplus) balances (from <br /> <br />recommended budgets) with actual and audited balances. Council also concurred <br /> <br />with Councilman's Groden's suggestion that Council be apprised (by reports) of <br /> <br />findings from periodic/surprise cash audits. <br /> <br />In reviewing a report submitted by City Manager Brown and his staff on the <br /> <br />potential usage and/or development of properties along Smith Lake Road, Council <br /> <br />was presented with the conclusion that, because of many factors (including <br /> <br />topography and prohibitive land-grading costs as well as inaccessibility to the <br /> <br />nearby Norfolk & Western Railroad) cited in the report, residential usage <br /> <br />appears to be the best option for development of the area, pending determination <br /> <br />of the feasibility of providing water service to the area and pending a <br /> <br />determination of the interest on the part of private landowners and realtors in <br /> <br />attempting to develop the property for residential usuage, along with the <br /> <br />cooperation of the County of Henry inasmuch as portions of the area are within <br /> <br />Henry County. Mr. Brown indicated that he would discuss this matter with <br /> <br />realtors and the property owners. <br />