Laserfiche WebLink
:i. 54 <br /> <br />THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1998 <br /> <br />more than the $1.1 million that they had estimated. Vice-Mayor Teague noted that all of the City's Meals Tax <br />revenues would go to the school system, with $455,000 to go to annual debt for the Middle School <br />renovation. Mayor Crabtree noted the steady growth of revenue related to travel and tourism activity, and <br />that it was growing at a faster rate than property tax revenues. Vice-Mayor Teague commented that the audit <br />report reflected good fiscal management practices by the Council and City staff, and good leadership from the <br />City Manager, Mr. Earl Reynolds, Jr.. Mr. Bartlett then reviewed a report from the Commissioner of <br />Revenue, stating that although property values in the City had only shown an increase of .017% this was <br />positive when compared to the previous year' s 11% decline. Council Member Haskell asked what impact the <br />Auto Tax Repeal might have, and Mr. Bartlett stated the effect should be neutral if the State followed through <br />on its reimbursement of these funds. Mayor Crabtree also noted the positive potential impact of the dollars <br />returned to taxpayers in terms of consumer spending. City Manager Reynolds then noted that the City had <br />received $200,000 more in funding for the Uptown Rail Trail Project than the $80,000 already expected, and <br />reviewed the elements of the project for Council's benefit. Some discussion then took place concerning this <br />project. <br /> <br />Council next heard a presentation on a proposal for an Enhanced Residential Refuse Collection Program, <br />provided by Mr. Leon Towamicki, Director of Public Works. Mr. Towamieki noted that the discussion <br />covered only residential collection, and did not include the separate issue of commercial collection services <br />provided. He then went on to state the value of the residential service, saying that the monthly fee of $7.50 <br />collected from residents for residential service did not cover the cost of the program. Council Member <br />Haskell noted that this was also one of the most highly rated services by the residents in customer surveys of <br />the past. Mr. Towamicki went on to state that the service costs had been kept very low through measures <br />that were not typical of good management practices, citing the failure to replace capital equipment at <br />appropriate times, use of inmate labor rather than paid staff, and inadequate numbers of staff for the task, <br />especially during the Quarterly Pick-Up program. He went on to say that although the Quarterly Pick-Up <br /> <br /> <br />