Laserfiche WebLink
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1998 <br /> <br />awarded. When asked what existing shell buildings might serve as good examples, facilities in Carroll <br /> <br />County, Waynesboro, Pulaski, and Pittsylvania County were cited. At the dose of the telephone conversation <br />Mr. Hamed pointed out that the Shell Building Program was essentially a loan program designed to help <br />communities which were financially stressed and could not readily afford to finance such projects at regular <br />market rates. Mr. Hamed also noted the importance of the relationship that occurs between the VEDP and a <br />participating jurisdiction when a shell building is in place, in that the VEDP works very hard to help the <br />locality market the building, in order to recover the construction ~mds as soon as possible. Council Member <br />Haskell stated that it was clear that rapid turnover of the buildings in the program was important. Further <br />discussion among Council, staff and the engineering consultant then took place, covering the subjects of <br />building design and location, optimum building size and expandability, and transportation issues. Mr. Hubbell <br />presented design concepts and architectural renderings relative to a recommendation for a shell building in <br />the Clearview Business Park development. A building of 50,000 to 60,000 square feet with expansion <br />capability to 100,000 to 120,000 square feet was proposed. Discussion then ensued concerning size, <br />placement, configuration and architectural features of the proposed building. There was general agreement <br />that any building constructed should have as much flexibility as possible in terms of expansion and finish <br />features. Mr. Hubbell estimated that construction of the proposed building would cost about $1 million, <br />including about $170,000 for site costs. Mr. Hamed stated that, although construction funds might not be <br />available until the process for the VEDP loan was acquired, the design work and other elements of <br />preparation for the shell building could move ahead and be reimbursed later from this or some other funding <br />source. He also stated that taking such initiatives would not jeopardize the City' s competitiveness in the Shell <br />Building Fund competition. Council Member Haskell asked City Manager Earl Reynolds what other funding <br />sources might be available if the Shell Building Program effort proved unsuccessful. Mr. Reynolds replied <br />that there were several options, including the Industrial Development Authority and the Martinsville Housing <br />and Redevelopment Authority. He stated that, although the interest rate would not be as favorable, the <br />payments could be structured over a longer period, to reduce annual costs. The general consensus of Council <br /> <br /> <br />