Laserfiche WebLink
142 <br /> .TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1998 <br /> <br /> was abundant evidence to support that the existing Special Use Permit should not be extended, and that a new <br /> <br /> permit process would correct current and future problems. She urged Council not to give "rubber stamp" <br /> approval to the developer, citing the negative impact on housing values in the neighborhood, safety concerns, <br /> sediment and erosion control problems, rental property problems, and noise in the neighborhood related to the <br /> development. Mrs. Wilson urged Council to deny the Permit extension. Mrs. Lynn Pritchett came forward <br /> again to speak, and stated that unless there is some obligation to allow the rest of the phases of this <br /> development to be done the permit should be denied. She noted that the developer was still free to develop <br /> the property under R-9 code conditions without a special use permit. Mrs. Pritchett also asked Mr. Adkins to <br /> forgive the residents of the neighborhood for harsh words that have been said, and stated that this is just a <br /> very emotional issue for them. She asked Mr. Adkins to try to work with them for a solution. There were no <br /> other speakers, and the hearing was closed. Mrs. Haskell stated that she felt the need for more information on <br /> the issue of compliance with sediment and erosion control requirements. The Mayor stated there were three <br /> options available to Council; approve or deny the permit, or ask staff for more information and defer a vote. <br /> V~ce-Mayor Crabtree suggested that there was a fourth option, that of renewing the Special Use Permit with <br /> revisions. Mrs. Haskell again cited the need to further study storm water runoff calculations, and the Mayor <br /> expressed the need to examine substantial compliance with the recreational area requirements. Mrs. Haskell <br /> noted that a developer takes a risk that the law may change over a 10 to 15 year period, as in this case. Vice- <br /> Mayor Crabtree stated that the City had allowed a project that had had unintended consequences. Council <br /> Member Teague stated that he needed more information, particularly on an updated site plan, a sediment and <br /> erosion control plan, and some legal issues, and suggested that these and other concerns should be referred ~-- <br /> back to City administration for assistance to the Council. Council Member Dallas stated that he also needed <br /> more time to consider the appropriate action. Mayor Adams then stated to City Manager Reynolds that staff <br /> should look at the zoning ordinance, site plan, recreation area placement, and a review of planning <br /> <br /> Commission recommendations, and suggested that a good visual barrier might be done with Leyland Cyprus <br /> trees. Mr. Dallas noted that further review before action on the Special Use Permit should not delay the <br /> <br /> <br />