Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/r-- <br /> <br />~':f <br />~i <br />i <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />FEBRUARY J1.J., 1956 <br /> <br />The Council received this study on December 22, 1955 and at their next <br />meeting released their tentative decision to pay fcr the bonds throuGh an <br />incrr3ase in the property tax. The City Attorney advised Council that it <br />would be necessary to amend the City Charter in order to Increase the taxes <br />sul'ficiently to pay for the bonds. He req'~ested that this required step be <br />given thorough publicity. Such was donG by feo.turc stories in both press <br />and radio on December 28, 1955. Again on January 4, 1945, January 25, 1956 <br />and Jcmuary 30, 1956. The Charter change would be permissive legislation <br />with the Council pledged to increase taxes only to the extent needed to pay <br />for the bonds. Therefore, Council has not called a public heariIl[. on the <br />proposed charter ctcmge for the pr'inciple reason that since the tax increase <br />would be used only in the event the people voted the bonds it vIas felt this <br />would amount to a vote on the tax increase itself. <br /> <br />Council feels that it has ? most serious obligation to the public to advise <br />them 2.3 to hov:r -c,he prm;osed bonds can be financed prior to the time that the <br />public is called upon to vote on the issue. Hovmver, local people having <br />notified the City Council and our Delegates and Senators that they are <br />opposed to an incrC;:cse in our tax limit, we must fine) an alternate means of <br />financing the bonds. <br /> <br />Therefore, at this time, it is believed by Cocmcil t'~at if the public votes <br />for the $1,450,000 school bond issue on March 15 it "\'1111 be necessary to <br />raise tho real estate and public service corporations tax frora $2.00 to $2.25 <br />and :::'inance the balance of the bonds 'Ni th a two to U'.ree percent consumers <br />utility tax or by some other means such as a carbaGe collection tax. <br /> <br />In further connection vr1 th .~he School bond election and the tax rate limit aITBndrrent, <br /> <br />Council acknovlledged a letter from the M8rtinsville-IIenry County Real Estate Board <br /> <br />questioning the need for a tax rate limit increase ;:mcl 2. letter from Mr. Leon Globman <br /> <br />sU'TJorting the City's efforts to provide needed improvements. <br /> <br />City Lia.nager rYcathewson read to the Council a letter fro"l Mr. H. C. Lester dated <br /> <br />February 14, 1956 regarding the closure and abandonment of ," part of the Dye Plant <br /> <br />Road near its intersection with the East rrnrgin of HiGhway 11220 contiguous to what is <br /> <br />knmvn as 2. Texaco Service Station, property of H. C. I.,cster. In view of the fact <br /> <br />that a right-of-way has been obtained from Hr. Lester across the Southern portion of <br /> <br />the Texaco Service Station property which will take the place of the portion of the <br /> <br />Dye Plant Road asked to be abcmdoned; that is to say, there will be a new entrance <br /> <br />leading from the 1PJe Plant Road into Highway 11220, and it has been determined by the <br />