Laserfiche WebLink
<br />18 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />JANUARY 12. 1924 <br /> <br />Also, in accordance with duly-advertised public notice, Council conducted <br /> <br />a Public Hearing on a propos~l and recommendation, as submitted by the <br /> <br />Planning Commission December 22, 1953, to close and abandon Slpine and Spruce <br /> <br />Streets in the vicinity of the intersection of Lavinder street 1fith the new <br /> <br />Route 220 Thoroughfare and to close and abandon that portion of said Lavinder <br /> <br />street south of said Route 220 Thoroughfare lying along the front of lots <br /> <br />60, 61, 62, and 63. There being no objections registered by any person to <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />this proposal, Council placed on first readlllg a resolution which would carry <br /> <br />out the Commission's recommendation. <br /> <br />In accepting the following report and recommendation of the City's Planning <br /> <br />Comrnission, dated January 11, 1954, Council ordered a Public Hearing to be <br /> <br />held on same, after being duly-advertised, at the regular meeting of the Council <br /> <br />~- <br />~~ <br />i <br /> <br />to be held February 9, 1954: <br /> <br />The Council at its meeting on December 22, 1953 referred to this <br />Commission a petition from the fu~erican Furniture Company for its <br />consideration. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission at a call meeting Wednesday, December 30, <br />1953, voted un.e"limously to IIlc'l.ke the fol1m.J'"i.Jlg recommendation to <br />the City Council: <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />That a section of Hairston street from a point 150 feet <br />west of Starling Avenue to the dead end of same be <br />officially abandoned insof"r as the Cit;yr of Hartinsville <br />hE.s any interests therein. <br /> <br />In making the above recommendation, the Planning Commission wishes <br />to cite the following considerations. <br /> <br />1. The City Council by ordinance previously closed this <br />portion of Hairston Street to public use insofar as traffic <br />was concerned. <br /> <br />2. In overall planning, the Commission feels that this <br />street is no longer a logical through street for traffic in <br />view of the fact th2t it n01-1 dead ends at the Norfolk and <br />\-lest~rn Fai1road, and an extension of smne is impractical, if <br />not impossible. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission respectfully submits its recommendation to <br />City Council for its further consideration. <br />