Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~60 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />JANUARY 24, 1961 <br /> <br />pertaining to Council's recorded intention of acquiring Annalachian's <br /> <br />facilities in the area annexed to tbe City on January 1, 1960: <br /> <br />You have asked by means of your letter of January 17th, tl:at we <br />supply you with a valuation of the physical facilities which our <br />company owns in the newly annexed area knm.m as Druid Hills. <br />These facilities are necessary to serve the 111 customers nresently <br />existj.ng there and will provide the facilities for some 200 additional <br />customers as they occur in this new residential area. <br /> <br />The present day value depreciated of this property as of December 31, <br />1960, is enumerated on the attached exhibit. You 1.-Till find tl~at <br />we have identified each of the costs by their F.P.C. accolmt n~~bers <br />and this provides considerable detailed data. <br /> <br />We again wish to state that we prefer not to sell this part of our <br />business but we have acceded to your denand that '.Te establish a <br />sales price whicD Has recited in our pronosal letter of January q. <br />The value of the business is the basis of our proposal. <br /> <br />"\ole do not consider that the physical nroperty is a fair basis for <br />determining value because these facilities are merely the vehicles <br />employed to convey and distribute the electric energy. It requires <br />no more poles to transmit a large block of power that a small quantity. <br />Since the number of physical units has no relationship to the amount of <br />energy conveyed or the value of this cO!l1Jnodity, He have abandoned <br />physical measnrements and aC!optec3 revenue production n.s a fair and <br />universally accepted basis for Ol~ proposal. When you consider that <br />~4artinsville would be conveyed a block of business with an assured <br />large profit and when you consider that this business has a potential <br />profit of three times its present size with very little added investment, <br />then our proposal must be considered not only fair but quite conservat:ive. <br /> <br />As you know, we offered to purchase the City of Hartinsville facilities at <br />a price for the business of $4,864,500. Your valuation of the physical <br />facilities was $1,507,9'70, a ratio of 3.23 to 1. ~.Je now offer to sell <br />our business at your insistence for $67,394, Hhereas the vaDlation is <br />$40,201, a ratio of only 1.68 to 1. This further confirms that our method <br />of pricing is moderate and just by any equitable standard of mlsiness practice. <br /> <br />Again, we offer to meet with yml and Members of the Council of the City <br />of Martinsville at any time to discuss our nroposal. <br /> <br />350.2 <br />354 <br />355 <br />358.1 <br />358.3 <br />359. 1 <br />360. 1 <br />360.3 <br />363.1 <br /> <br />Present Day Cost <br />Depreciated <br />As of 12-31-60 <br /> <br />Land and Land Rights $ 1,045. <br />Distribution Poles, Towers & Fixtures 9,741. <br />Distribution Overhead Conductors & Devices7,3?O. <br />Line Transformers - In Service 9,502. <br />Line Transformer Devices 1,340. <br />Overhead Services 3,340. <br />Meters - In Service 2,076. <br />~eter Devices 510. <br />Overhead Street Lighting 5.277. <br />Total $40,201. <br /> <br />Account <br />