My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 11/09/1965
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1965
>
Minutes 11/09/1965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2007 10:01:06 AM
Creation date
1/26/2007 9:49:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
11/9/1965
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4{ <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 9. 1965 <br /> <br />line fifty feet northeast of and parallel thereto remain in its <br /> <br />present "R-6 Residential" classification, this being in connection <br /> <br />with petition filed with Council under date of October 12, 1965; and <br /> <br />(3) to amend Section X of the City's Zoning Code by revising paragraph <br /> <br />"bf1 of Subsection 3 (C-1 District) to read "One wall or painted <br /> <br />accessory sign denoting the name of the occupant of the premises on <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />each wall in which there is a primary or secondary entrance open to <br /> <br />the general public. Such sign shall have a maximum area of 3 square <br /> <br />feet for each lineal foot of the shortest building frontage occupied <br /> <br />by a single permitted use.f1 .... and by adding a new paragraph, <br /> <br />entitled paragraph f1e", to read f1For each premises having accessory <br /> <br />vehicular service entrances, one identification wall sign over each <br /> <br />. <br />such entrance, having a maximum area of one square foot for each <br /> <br />lineal foot of entrance opening. Such sign shall serve only to <br /> <br />identify the general purpose of such entrance and shall bear no <br /> <br />reference to a specific name or product sold on the premises.1I <br /> <br />Also, by report dated November 9, 1965, the Planning Commission unanimously <br /> <br />recommended that no amendment be enacted to the City's 'Zoning Code to permit <br /> <br />the conduct of the business of IIPalmistry" at 209 Broad Street. In accepting <br /> <br />this recommendation, Council denied the petition of Mrs. Ruby Costello, as <br /> <br />filed with Council on October 26, 1965. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry of Mr. C. Harry Anglin, Council indicated that it <br /> <br />would prepare a final draft of a proposed CATV franchise ordinance within the <br /> <br />immediate future, with the intent of advertising same for bids pursuant to <br /> <br />prescribed regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.