Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t.)Q <br />, I , <br />~',,' <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />APRIL 23, 1968 <br /> <br />The Commission respectfully submits the above recommendation <br />for Council's further consideration. <br /> <br />(2) Your Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Thursday, <br />April 18, on a matter referred to them by Council. This matter <br />was a petition as submitted by the Martinsville Volunteer Fire <br />Company requesting a Special Use Permit to allow them to hold <br />their annual bazaar on Brown Street Field the week of June 24th. <br /> <br />Following this public hearing, with a quorum present, the <br />Commission voted linanimously to recommend to Council that a <br />Special Use Permit be granted the Volunteer Fire Company for <br />a period of three years, subject to review by Council each <br />year and subject to a closing time each night at 10:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The Commission encountered no opposition to this petition at <br />its public hearing and feels that the granting of this Special <br />Use Permit benefits the City as a whole. <br /> <br />The Commission respectfully submits the above recommendation <br />for Council's further consideration. <br /> <br />Under date of April 23, 1968, the Special Tax Study Committee presented the <br /> <br />following report, which Council took under advisement: <br /> <br />At the la:'1t meeting of Council it was decided that the Tax Study Committee <br />should try to make specific suggestions as to a possible revision of and <br />broadening of the City's utility tax setup. This report is an attempt <br />to carry out the desire of Council. <br /> <br />This particular phase of the Committee's work involved the securing <br />from and the studying of much information, some of it privileged, <br />from the files of the City Electric Department as well as from <br />private utilities and some local industries, and here let us express <br />the Committee's appreciation for their cooperation. <br /> <br />1. Existing Tax on Electric Customers <br /> <br />First, a review of the existing utility tax structure, applying <br />only to electric customers of the City and about 92 APCo customers <br />in the City, is in order. Under the present ordinance all City <br />utility and APCo accounts are assessed at one dollar per month <br />tax, and in addition to this, there is a monthly tax of one <br />d,)llar on electric bills up to $10.00; a tax of $1.50 on bills <br />between $10.00 and $20.00, and a tax of $2.00 on bills greater <br />than $20.00 per month. This present utility tax produces about <br />$181,000 per year. <br /> <br />2. S~ggested Tax on Electric Customers <br /> <br />In order to broaden the base of this tax and secure more revenue <br />it is suggested that the existing utility tax structure be <br />abandoned and in its place there be established a minimum <br />