My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 09/01/1972
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1972
>
Minutes 09/01/1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2006 9:52:24 AM
Creation date
12/14/2006 9:27:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/1/1972
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />) <br />wi <br /> <br />FRIDAY <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 1, 1972 <br /> <br />business proposed by City Manager Noland, as hereinafter set forth in these <br /> <br />minutes. Meanwhile, upon inquiry regarding the positions of Clerk of <br /> <br />Council and of City Attorney, Council was advised that persons filling <br /> <br />these positions (from prior appointments) serve at the pleasure or will of <br /> <br />Council and (that) it is not necessary for Council formally to reappoint <br /> <br />persons presently filling these positions. <br /> <br />City Manager Noland notified Council that official notice has been received <br /> <br />by the City Manager and the City Attorney of Lee Telephone Company's rate <br /> <br />increase application now on file before the State Corporation Commission; <br /> <br />that the City has until October 9, 1972 to file--if it so desires--an answer <br /> <br />to the application or petition; and, that the State Corporation Commission has <br /> <br />set the date of October 18, 1972 for a public hearing thereon. City Manager <br /> <br />Noland then outlined the several recourses open to the City, viz., whether <br /> <br />to let pass unchallenged or to challenge, or to intervene actively. This <br /> <br />last-named recourse, City Manager Noland pointed out, would require retaining <br /> <br />of expert assistance, such as rate specialists, and would result in considerable <br /> <br />expense to the City and/or to the City and other participating jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Members of Council expressed no opposition to what is considered a reasonable <br /> <br />return by petitioner on its investment; however, Council, in pointing out that <br /> <br />certain proposed increases would reflect slightly more than 50% increase, <br /> <br />expressed the opinion that petitioner's application should not go unchallenged; <br /> <br />whereupon motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Council directed that <br /> <br />other area jurisdictions served by Lee Telephone Company be contacted to <br /> <br />ascertain their interest in intervening in the case, and protesting thereof, <br /> <br />and (that) Council's position herein in the interest of its citizens be set <br /> <br />forth in letters to the City's representatives in the Virginia General Assembly <br /> <br />'"".---..-----'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.