Laserfiche WebLink
<br />292 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 23, 1976 <br /> <br />cause gross margin to be about $106,000 less than expected. <br /> <br />On the positive side, expenses other than purchased power, <br />are projected to be $36,000 less than budgeted, and Council <br />set aside a $100,000 safety margin to guard against a <br />potential forecasting error and provide for emergencies and <br />unbudgeted capital expenditures. Hopefully, if expenses <br />continue at the present level and no emergencies arise, the <br />Electric Department will meet its budgeted profit objectives, <br />although it is my understanding that Electric Department <br />expenditures will be necessary in the Brookdale Road <br />construction. <br /> <br />The Electric Department should show ample profit to cover <br />the transfer to the General Fund because I have not included <br />the 6.6% rate surcharge in my figures, which should bring <br />in an additional $218,700 (based on the October billing) <br />although I feel the City should strive to meet its original <br />budgeted profit objective which did not include the surcharge. <br />And, I also think Council should discuss priorities for the <br />expenditure of this windfall money. Alternatives include <br />Community Development capital expenditures, payment of <br />operating expenses and/or addition to the Electric Department <br />surplus. <br /> <br />2. The second potential problem is that Municipal and Circuit <br />Court fines are now expected to show a shortfall of about <br />$29,000. I have discussed this problem with City Officials <br />and it is being investigated. <br /> <br />Finally, this year's budget was balanced by using $289,875 <br />Revenue Sharing Funds ($88,125 less than two years ago) and <br />the City will actually receive $435,316.00, which will leave <br />$145,441 to be used for non-recurring community outlays such <br />as mini-parks, the thoroughfare street program and school <br />buses or other projects. I suggest that Council discuss how <br />this money is to be spent. <br /> <br />In tentative acceptance of the Planning Commission's recommendations that Lots <br /> <br />No. 25 and 26, fronting the north side of Gravely Street, and Lots Nos. 28 and <br /> <br />29, fronting the east of side of Moss Street, owned by Mr. James C. Stone and <br /> <br />the City of Martinsville, respectively, as shown on Block Q, Section 32, of <br /> <br />the City's Tax Map, be rezoned to "C-2 Commercial", Council called for a <br /> <br />duly-advertised public hearing to be conducted on this proposal at Council's <br /> <br />forthcoming December 28th meeting. <br />