My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 09/09/1975
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1975
>
Minutes 09/09/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2006 2:58:20 PM
Creation date
12/11/2006 2:44:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/9/1975
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />92 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />SEPTEMBER 9, 1975 <br /> <br />The issue appears to go deeper than this one piece of property, <br />because there is evidence that this case will possibly set a precedent <br />for further development along the east side of Rives Road. Mr. <br />Barnes stated at the August 26th Public Hearing: "...1 feel that <br />it's not in good planning practice, it breaks up the continuity <br />of the industrial activities that are on the west side of Rives <br />Road. It brings it across the road and whenever you do this, <br />if you put in a Seven-Eleven store or commercial activity or <br />something outside of residential use, you will always bring <br />on the old creeping paralysis. Next comes the other industrial <br />activity, the adjacent commercial activity...I think we have a <br />fine example of it in this comprehensive plan on Collinsville <br />Road." <br /> <br />Dave Worthy, City Attorney, advises that the courts will overrule <br />zoning decisions that are not consistent with the comprehensive plan <br />for the physical development of the city. <br /> <br />In this regard, I again quote from the tape of the Public Hearing: <br />Councilman Fitz-Hugh: "Six months ago you indicated that it would <br />be best used as transitional. Transitional implies to me that <br />something other than what. . . " <br />Mr. Barnes: "Something other than but compatible to the adjacent <br />land use activity. I think one thing, you may find this in your <br />zoning ordinance also, one of the reasons for the adopting, of <br />course, the zoning regulations is for the protection of the <br />property owner. Not only the property owner of the property in <br />question but the adjacent property." <br /> <br />In my judgement, this is a key issue--exactly what is the <br />adjacent land use activity that the property must be compatible <br />with? Is the road a natural boundary, or does the adjacent <br />property include the land across the street? <br /> <br />Jack Kiser, Attorney for Roy Stone, argues that Rives Road <br />is a natural boudary, and to cross it would "constitute spot <br />zoning in its worst form." Doug Frith, Attorney for Nationwide <br />Homes, counters with the arguments, among others, that "the <br />request is not for a classification totally different from <br />the surrounding area since the land is directly across the <br />street from land in the exact same zoning classification," <br />that Rives Road is an industrial access road "for which City <br />Council has expended in excess of $150,000 City tax dollars", <br />and refers to Council minutes which state, "in order to improve <br />industrial access to the entire area." <br /> <br />The recommended land use of the property on the 1995 Land-Use <br />Plan, which is a part of the Comprehensive Plan of the City, <br />proposed by Wiley and Wilson and adopted by the City, shows <br />the property is "open space transitional". Obviously, before <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.