My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 08/26/1980
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
Minutes 08/26/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2006 1:23:31 PM
Creation date
12/6/2006 11:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
8/26/1980
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~. ".'" <br />~ / () <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />AUGUST 26, 1980 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />101 units for the elderly and handicapped; <br />186 units under VHDA's subsidized housing program for <br />existing housing; <br />Approximately 40 units under the Housing Rehabilitation <br />Project; <br />Approximately 31 units under the recently approved <br />Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program through <br />VHDA; and <br />Home ownership programs, such as approximately 51 <br />units in Deerfield Acres, 22 units on Melody Court, <br />and 90 units on Forest Lake. <br />This is a total of close to 600 units. And all of these programs, <br />in my opinion, have served to achieve the City's yearly goals <br />for assisted housing without impacting neighborhoods with a <br />concentration of assisted housing. <br /> <br />At the same time, Council did not vote for a 100-unit subsidized <br />housing development on Chatham Heights in 1975, a 100-unit <br />subsidized housing development on Pine Hall Road in 1979, and took <br />no action on a 1979 invitation to apply for a grant to construct <br />a 100-unit public housing project. The citizens were opposed to <br />these projects because they felt the projects would be disruptive <br />to their neighborhoods and I felt the citizens were right. It is <br />significant, I think, that HUD took no further action when <br />Council did not go along with these projects, obviously because <br />of the City's demonstrated progress in meeting the housing needs of <br />the citizens. Furthermore, HUD has obviously been pleased with the <br />housing efforts of the City because we have been awarded with 3 <br />Hun grants. For these reasons, I feel that Council should continue <br />its current course of pursuing housing programs that meet our <br />needs while not disrupting or disturbing neighborhoods by <br />concentrating assisted housing. And, as I've already pointed out, <br />I have serious concerns that this project does not meet the <br />objectives of Council. <br /> <br />One final observation -- In March of 1980, Council discussed with <br />Assistant City Manager George Brown and the West Piedmont Planning <br />Commission Director, Larry Burnette, the validity of the number of <br />households that recent West Piedmont figures show need assistance <br />in Martinsville. Mr. Brown feels that because of the way in which <br />the figures are derived, there is no valid differentiation made <br />between new units needed and rehabilitation units needed. <br />Mr. Burnette agrees. For this reason, Council included a $15,000 <br />grant request in the recently approved Housing Rehabilitation Program <br />in order that we may perform a thorough Analysis of Housing Needs <br />in the City, update our Housing Assistance Plan, and identify the <br />condition of our existing housing supply and other areas needing <br />rehabilitation. Until this study is completed, it seems to me that <br />Council should not amend its goals to allow additional units for <br />new construction; instead, we should continue to improve our <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.