Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Many "cases" have been posed in the past for analysis, using different sets <br />of future assumptions as to the variables. There follows a discussion of <br />certain terms or concepts necessary to understand all these cases and the <br />remarkable range of results. <br /> <br />Interest Rates - When bonds are sold they bear a stated interest <br />rate, payable along with principal within an amortization schedule. <br />Past case studies assume a single sale of bonds and the same <br />interest rate on the entire bond issue. <br /> <br />Reserve Fund - A certain amount of the proceeds of a bond sale <br />must be held in reserve, as a guarantee to the bond holders, <br />for the life of the issue. The amount of the reserve is generally <br />related to the average annual amount of debt service. <br /> <br />Arbitrage - Municipal bonds are tax-free and ordinarily sell at <br />interest rates lower than taxable corporate bonds. Proceeds from <br />municipal bond sales that are not immediately expended (such as . <br />the Reserve Fund or which are idle during the construction process) <br />can, therefore, be invested short-term and produce a ~'profitH. <br />Arbitrage is the difference between the interest we must pay on <br />borrowed funds and the interest we may earn on those same funds. <br />Arbitrage can be positive or negative, but historically it has been <br />positive, by as much as 2%. It is currently negative; but, which- <br />ever it is, arbitrage can be a critical factor in financing a large <br />public works project. <br /> <br />Net Construction Cost - With the profitable benefit of positive <br />arbitrage, it is possible to actually borrow less money than is <br />necessary to pay the cost of a construction project; and the <br />amount to be borrowed is described in these terms. <br /> <br />Cost of Purchased Power - This refers to the wholesale cost <br />to the City of buying power (demand charges) from APCo. <br />Feasibility of the Ridgeway Project can only be expressed as <br />a reflection of projections about APCo's wholesale rates, begin- <br />ning in 1985. It is basically necessary to assume that the <br />Ridgeway Project will produce power at an appreciably lower <br />cost. The first Beck projections of APCo's 1985 demand charge <br />was $129/kw, countered by the Select Committee's more conser- <br />vative estimate of $100/kw. Beck's current estimate is a <br />compromise of $118/kw. <br /> <br />Inflation Rate - All other economic factors involved in the project <br />(and attempts to analyze its feasibility) are very sensitive to <br />the country's overall future rate of inflation. <br /> <br />Ramped Capitalized Interest - This is a financing approach that <br />could eliminate the short-term deficits predicted by various case <br />studies. It is simply a mattcr of selling additional bonds, using <br />the proceeds to cover the deficits and thus deferring them until <br />the latter years of the amortization schedule, when the project <br />will be more profitable. This is not an unusual practice, according <br />to the financial advisors, and is acceptable to bond undcrwriters. <br /> <br />-9- <br />