Laserfiche WebLink
<br />On November 15, 1979, the Phase II-A Report was delivered to the City. It <br />claimed that the Ridgeway Site was favorable, from a geotechnical point of <br />view, and maintained that the project was still feasible economically, with good <br />cost-benefit ratios. The report went ahead to recommend proceeding with <br />Phase II-B work, flnecessary to provide a proper evaluation and justification <br />of the Project's technical and economic feasibility to be used as a basis during <br />preparation and ~rocessing of the FERC License Application with Federal, State <br />and local agencies, and to support Project financingfl. <br /> <br />Re-Enter Select Committee <br /> <br />Beck's Phase II-A Report was given to the Select Committee for evaluation. <br />The Committee reported to the Council on December 18, 1979, agreeing with <br />the Phase II-A Report recommendation to proceed with Phase II-B; suggesting <br />that bond counsel be retained; and calling attention to the need for proper <br />timing for obtaining citizen support for the project. <br /> <br />Re-Enter Beck <br /> <br />A work order agreement in the amount of $200,000 was entered into with Beck <br />October 9, 1979, to proceed with the Phase II-B Evaluation Report. Work on <br />this report commenced in January, 1980, and is still underway at this time. <br />Delivery of the report is expected in November, 1980. <br /> <br />It will basically complete the studies and elements begun in Phase II-A <br />"to provide proper evaluation and justification of the Project's technical <br />and economic feasibility to be used as a basis during preparation and <br />processing of the FERC License Application.'! <br /> <br />Selection of Bond Counsel <br /> <br />As the project was developing and as discussion of a possible bond referen- <br />dum became more frequent, it was decided by City Council to retain a law <br />firm specializing in such matters. With the assistance of City Attorney Dave <br />Worthy, an agreement for these services was entered into with the Richmond <br />firm of McGuire, Woods & Battle. <br /> <br />By resolution on May 13, 1980, Council engaged this firm to review the City <br />Charter and applicable federal and state laws, and to advise the City on all <br />legal procedures and matters relating to the Ridgeway Project. <br /> <br />Selection of Financial Advisory Group <br /> <br />In April, 1980, the City circulated an RFP to the investment banking world, <br />announcing its intention to select a firm(s) to render financial advisory <br />services to the Ridgeway Project. The RFP described certain services that <br />would be required before and including a bond referendum, as well as certain <br />services necessary after the referendum. <br /> <br />A number of firms submitted proposals, which were, at Council's request, <br />reviewed by the Select Committee. The result was the selection of a three- <br />firm group, including Wheat, First Securities, Inc.; Blyth Eastman Paine <br />Webber, Inc.; and Salamon Brothers. The role of coordinator for this <br />combine was to be played by Wheat, First Securities. <br /> <br />-5- <br />