My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 03/11/1980
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
Minutes 03/11/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2006 1:20:59 PM
Creation date
12/6/2006 10:57:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
3/11/1980
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, ',',: 2' <br />, I ..,I <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />MARCH 11, 1980 <br /> <br />As brought forward from its February 26th meeting, Council resumed its consideration of whether <br /> <br />to file a formal and final application for a grant of $600,000.00 to finance the cost of <br /> <br />rehabilitating selected sub-standard residences located in both the West End and North Side <br /> <br />sections of the City, for which required public hearings have been conducted but for which <br /> <br />certain "ground rulesll (i. e., designating an administrative authority, determining whether the <br /> <br />cost of rehabilitating each such residence would become an outright grant or would constitute a <br /> <br />loan, with or without interest, to the property owner involved, etc.) have not been developed, <br /> <br />pending acceptance of the total grant and the execution of a contract therefor. In support of <br /> <br />the program and the filing of a final application, Councilman Greene presented the following <br /> <br />prepared statement: <br /> <br />I have discussed this program with Mr. Noland, Mr. Brown, Mr. Grubbs, and <br />Mr. Worthy. I attended the public hearing on Friday night. I drove to <br />the target areas. Based on what I have learned, my conclusion is that the <br />program has merit and I will vote for it. My reasons are as follows: <br /> <br />First, our citizens from all parts of the city have expressed objection to <br />large subsidized housing developments which they feel impact and disrupt <br />neighborhoods. On the other hand, HUD's policy is that the placement of <br />subsidized housing developments in a community is dependent on HUD's <br />interpretation of the need for such housing, not on the community's <br />reaction to subsidized housing. It doesn't matter how a neighborhood or <br />a city feels about subsidized housing--what matters is a community's <br />documented need for subsidized housing and the efforts of the community <br />to meet the need. Because recent studies show that Martinsville has a <br />need for subsidized housing and because HUD's policy is to provide <br />subsidized housing wherever a community has a need, then, as I see it, the <br />logical course for Council is to seek housing programs that will provide safe <br />and sanitary housing for our citizens but will not impact and disrupt our <br />neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Since I took office, I have tried to follow this course of action. <br /> <br />I have examined each Federal program on the basis of its merits in order to <br />determine if Martinsville needs the program and if there are strings <br />attached that are too stringent for the community to live with. <br /> <br />In 1975 I voted for the Section 8, Existing Housing Program, a program <br />designed to help low-income families, including elderly couples, find <br />shelter in existing inexpensive apartments. No new buildings were <br />constructed. According to figures released in December, '79, there were <br />186 participants in the program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.