My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 02/13/1979 (2)
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1979
>
Minutes 02/13/1979 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2006 3:59:15 PM
Creation date
12/5/2006 3:12:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/13/1979
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,~ ( <br />f~, <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 13, 1979 <br /> <br />addendum and, eventually, a part of the City's Employee Manual. Voting in the <br /> <br />affirmative on the motion for adoption were Messrs. Hobson, Cole, Oakes, and West; and <br /> <br />voting against the motion was Councilman Greene, for the reasons set forth in his <br /> <br />prepared statement, as follows: <br /> <br />Since the last time we discussed this plan, I understand that each <br />member of Council has met privately with the City Administration. <br /> <br />My position has not changed, and I would like to briefly outline <br />my feelings: <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />In March of 1977, Council agreed that productivity of City Hall <br />employees should be encouraged through a pay plan which rewards <br />employees who perform meritoriously with pay increases. Council's <br />decision was based on a report submitted by Municipal Advisors <br />Incorporated who stated, "It is recommended that annual merit <br />increases be granted to those employees who, on the basis of a <br />careful performance evaluation, deserve to receive a raise to <br />reward them for a sustained period of meritorious performance." <br /> <br />Council asked the City Administration to draw up a pay plan <br />which met these objectives. <br /> <br />I feel that the City Administration's proposed plan, which we <br />are now considering, does not accomplish Council's objective <br />of giving additional pay to those employees who perform better <br />than others, for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1. A large percentage of City Hall employees -- 47% to 62% <br />in the first five years -- will receive raises over-and- <br />above cost-of-living increases, based on an adequate, but <br />not exceptional, job. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />2. Virtually automatic across-the-board increases, in <br />addition to cost-of-living, are given to employees for the <br />first 5 years, or, through step six. <br /> <br />3. When step six is reached, an employee is eligible for <br />longevity pay increases, which enables the employee to get <br />pay increases, in addition to cost-of-living, simply by <br />coming to work every day, and not by doing an exceptional <br />job. <br /> <br />4. Only a small percentage of total pay increases over-and- <br />above cost-of-living are related to meritorious performance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.