Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r\ ') <br />~ / /-..,; <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 13, 1979 <br /> <br />207 Va. 432 (1966), the Supreme Court of Virginia held, because of <br />almost identical language of limitation in its enabling act, that <br />the Fairfax County Water Authority had not been granted "the <br />exclusive right to furnish water in Fairfax County." Both this <br />decision and the limitations contained in the enabling ordinances <br />of the Henry County PSA were brought to the attention of Judge <br />Thompson, not only in the oral argument at the conclusion of the <br />hearing but in subsequent letters, and why he chose to ignore them <br />in his decision is beyond me. <br /> <br />Because the Board did not see fit to confer a monopoly upon its <br />Authority, it would have exclusive jurisdiction to serve the <br />warehouse in question only if it were located within the mandatory <br />hook-up distance. The Authority, under state law, has the power <br />to compel connections with any buildings lying within this distance, <br />but the Board saw fit to limit it to 300 feet, although under state <br />law it could have been extended much, much further. Therefore, the <br />Authority has exclusive jurisdiction to furnish water to any <br />buildings lying within 300 feet of any of its mains, on either side <br />thereof, but the warehouse in question would not come within this <br />jurisdiction because it is 400 feet or more away from the nearest <br />PSA main. <br /> <br />Therefore, I am at a loss to find any rational basis for the <br />decision reached by Judge Thompson in this case and would strongly <br />recommend that it be appealed. There is, of course, no guarantee <br />that the appeal will be successful, but I believe that it should <br />be prosecuted as vigorously as possible. Otherwise, we can expect <br />Judge Thompson and other judges of like ilk to walk allover us <br />whenever we come before them. <br /> <br />Mr. Howard J. Beck, Jr., Attorney at Law and counsel for Mr. Jimmie R. Ford (and <br /> <br />Mr. Carlton Lee Ramsey), appeared before Council and cited the financial hardships <br /> <br />and inconveniences his clients are undergoing because the City has not yet, pending <br /> <br />a decision on the injunctive proceedings hereinabove described in these minutes, acted <br /> <br />upon--or granted--their request for City water service, filed with Council on November <br /> <br />14, 1978, to serve a four-unit apartment building under construction on Summit Drive, <br /> <br />in the Woodland Heights Subdivision, outside the City's corporate limits, which area <br /> <br />has been served by the City's water utility system for a number of years because of the <br /> <br />inability of any other water service company or agency to serve this area. Mr. Beck <br /> <br />noted, too, that--€ven today--the nearest Henry County Public Service Authority water <br />