Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DO <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 13, 1979 <br /> <br />set forth. <br /> <br />Upon motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried (by a recorded vote), Council <br /> <br />convened into an Executive Session to consider a legal matter and a report thereon <br /> <br />from City Attorney David B. Worthy, involving the injunctive proceedings recently <br /> <br />initiated by the Henry County Board of Supervisors (against the City of Martinsville) <br /> <br />to prohibit the City's supplying water service to a facility being constructed by <br /> <br />Frith Construction Company in--or adjoining--the City's Industrial Park, outside <br /> <br />of the City (see Council Minutes of December 12, 1978, page 167). Upon reconvening <br /> <br />into regular session, and having reviewed the decision of the presiding judge in this <br /> <br />case (viz., The Honorable W. Carrington Thompson, of the Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit), <br /> <br />as hereinafter made a part of these minutes, and upon motion (duly seconded and <br /> <br />unanimously carried), Council authorized City Attorney Worthy to appeal Judge Thompson's <br /> <br />decision, as recommended by the City Attorney in his February 6th memorandum to Council, <br /> <br />also made a part of these minutes: <br /> <br />Judge Thompson's Decision (by letter dated February 1, 1979) <br /> <br />The Court has had this matter under consideration since <br />the ore tenus hearing of January 3rd. <br /> <br />The City contends that its rights are not statutory but <br />are its common law right to dispose of surplus water, as <br />established in Town of Mount Jackson v. Nelson & Bauserman, <br />151 Va. 396 (1928). <br /> <br />In 56 Am Jur2d at page 621 under the caption MUNICIPAL <br />CORPORATIONS this is said: <br /> <br />"In the absence of express constitutional or <br />legislative regulation, it is generally held <br />that a municipal corporation, in conducting <br />extraterritorial activities such as public <br />utilities, is subject to the conditions in <br />force withln the outside territory in which it <br />acts. It has been declared broadly that a <br />munIcipality may not compel consumers outside <br />its corporate limits to purchase commodities or <br />services from it and, that, on the other hand, <br />it cannot be compelled to furnish commodities <br />or services to nonresidents." <br />