Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,"!6 <br />(:.t. <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />APRIL 25, 1978 <br /> <br />which an eight-unit apartment building could be built on each lot without <br />the necessity of a Special Use Permit. This would total sixteen units on <br />the property. Members of the Commission expressed the thought that, of the <br />various alternative methods for development of the properties, the <br />comprehensive development under the Special Use Permit was preferable to <br />the other alternatives and they recognized also the probability that use <br />of the property for substantially less units than those proposed would <br />probably be uneconomical in view of today's building costs. <br /> <br />Mr. James E. Severt, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Homes, Inc., <br /> <br />applicant, presented to Council a statement in support of his firm's application. In <br /> <br />opposition to the project and application were Mr. Roy C. Stone, of 1013 Sheraton Court, <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Vaughn, of 1015 Sheraton Court, both of whom own residential properties abutting <br /> <br />or near the proposed project, Mr. Richard Swain, of 706 Morrison Road, Mr. James R. Lewis, <br /> <br />of 713 Morrison Road, who also own residential properties nearby, all of whom contended <br /> <br />that the apartment complex, as proposed, housing up to eighty people, would be too large <br /> <br />for the site and could not provide recreational facilities for children therein and, <br /> <br />therefore, a "spill-over" of apartment-housed children onto adjoining residential <br /> <br />properties would occur. Supporting the above-named opponents to the project was the <br /> <br />local minister of the World Community of AI-Islam in the West. In response to an inquiry <br /> <br />from Council, Mr. James H. Ford, Attorney at Law and Chairman of the Planning Commission, <br /> <br />pointed out that statistics do not support the contention that residences or apartments <br /> <br />house an average of four people each and, further, being aware of applicant's alternative <br /> <br />course of constructing two eight-unit buildings on the property without a permit, with the <br /> <br />development thereof being less preferable than under the permit procedure, re-stated the <br /> <br />Planning Commission's position and reasoning for recommending the granting of such a permit. <br /> <br />Upon motion (by Councilman West) and second (by Councilman Greene), Council unanimously <br /> <br />directed the issuance of the Special-Use Permit requested by applicant, with Councilman <br /> <br />Oakes requesting--as he had initially suggested several months ago--that some uniform system <br /> <br />of guidelines be developed for locations of apartment complexes within the City in order <br /> <br />that best use of properties be made. <br />