My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 11/23/1982
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
Minutes 11/23/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2006 2:15:40 PM
Creation date
12/4/2006 2:04:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
11/23/1982
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
View images
View plain text
<br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 23, 1982 <br /> <br />To assist you in review, you will find below a repetition of Sell's <br />comments followed by our response: <br /> <br />UTILITY AND OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE <br /> <br />Procedures shou I d be es t ab I i shed to commence co I I ec t ion <br />procedures soon af te, an account becomes de Ii nquent. <br />Presently, I ittle collection efforts are used to collect <br />past-due accounts beyond the time that uti I ity service <br />is discontinued. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Uti I ity accounts should be reviewed periodically, and a <br />regular procedure of writing off uncollectable utility <br />accounts should be adopted. Accounts receivable collection <br />and recording procedures should be revised to provide for <br />the balancing of accounts receivable detai I bi II ings with <br />the accounts receivable control accounts on a regular basis. <br /> <br />Experience has shown that there is in reality little that can be done <br />administratively as to uncollected utility bills after the Electric/Water <br />service is terminated. Normally speaking, if termination of service does <br />not bring a response it means that the individual has moved on or has <br />vacated the premises. In either case, in the opinion of the City Attorney, <br />the individual(s) would most likely be "judgment proof" and the cost of <br />pursuing a judgment would be "throwing good money after bad". He also <br />advises that it could be risky to report non-payment of utilities to the <br />credit bureau since it could result in a libel suit. APCO turns delin- <br />quent accounts over to a private collection agency after 90 days at a fee <br />of 30%. We will investigate this approach. <br /> <br />At the present, the Billing Division runs a check on "new" customers to see <br />if they have a delinquent account with the City. In those cases where a <br />delinquency exists services are refused until the account is settled. <br />However, sometimes individuals get third parties to obtain service for them, <br />thereby effectively stymieing this effort. <br /> <br />We can legally go back three years using the search technique and we have <br />now had the computerized billing system changed to provide a program to do <br />the name search and to expand the history file for delinquent accounts to <br />three years. <br /> <br />As to establishing a procedure to write off uncollectable utility accounts <br />we would be pleased to work out the mechanics with Sells by which to <br />transfer all delinquencies over 90 days old to an account for bad debts. <br />This would not prevent us from collecting the delinquency within the <br />following 33-36 months if we were able to do so. <br /> <br />Procedures have already been established to balance the accounts receivable <br />detail billings with the accounts receivable control accounts on a quarterly <br />basis. Previously this was not accomplished with any regularity and pro- <br />gramming difficulties with the utility services "budget plan" in the computer <br />resulted in a minor error which could not be reconciled. A regular quarterly <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).