|
<br />236
<br />
<br />MONDAY
<br />
<br />DECEMBER 19, 1983
<br />
<br />A comparison of the County's share of the capital
<br />of the three basic options is presented below.
<br />these are based upon the best data available from
<br />
<br />costs related to each
<br />As previously stated,
<br />all sources at this
<br />
<br />time.
<br /> Additional Capacity Cost Per M.G.
<br /> To be Obtained by County's Share of Capacity
<br /> County of Capital Costs To be Obtained
<br />Option No. 1 1.5 MGD $2,835,7001 $1,890,500
<br />Option No. 2 1.00 MGD $1,300,000 $1,300,000
<br />Option No. 3 1. 50 MGD $ 386,100 $ 257,400
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />Based upon County's share of latest estimated costs for expanding
<br />City's plant from 6 to 8 MGD ($1,212,500), including odor control
<br />improvements, plus future expansion from 8 to 12 MGD ($1,623,200).
<br />This does not include the $1,219,820 the County has previously paid
<br />to the City for the 2.0 MGD (33%) allocation in the City's present
<br />plant.
<br />
<br />The following is a comparison of estimated capital costs of each of the
<br />Basic Options, the additional flow capacities associated with each and
<br />the resulting prorata costs to Henry County and the City of Martinsville:
<br />
<br />Henry County
<br />
<br />Martinsville
<br />
<br />Option
<br />1
<br />2
<br />3
<br />
<br />Additional
<br />Capacity
<br />(MGD)
<br />
<br />1.5
<br />
<br />1.0
<br />
<br />1.5
<br />
<br />Share of
<br />Capital Costs
<br />
<br />$2,835,700
<br />
<br />$1,300,000
<br />
<br />$ 386,100
<br />
<br />Cost per
<br />MG
<br />
<br />$1,890,000
<br />
<br />$1,300,000
<br />
<br />257,400
<br />
<br />Additional
<br />Capacity
<br />
<br />4.0
<br />2.0
<br />2.0
<br />
<br />Share of
<br />Capital Costs
<br />
<br />$5,757,700
<br />
<br />$3,674,600
<br />
<br />$3,674,600
<br />
<br />Cost per
<br />MG
<br />
<br />$1,439,400
<br />
<br />$1,882,300
<br />
<br />$1,882,300
<br />
<br />4_--
<br />"
<br />
<br />5_'--'-
<br />H ..,
<br />
<br />.67
<br />2.67
<br />
<br />$1,212,500
<br />$ 759,704
<br />
<br />$1,809,700
<br />$ 284,500
<br />
<br />1.33
<br />1. 33
<br />
<br />$2,462,100
<br />$1,611,000
<br />
<br />$1,851,200
<br />$1,211,300
<br />
<br />* Option No.4 represents the incremental expansion of the City's plant from 6 to
<br />8 MGD. It merely compares related costs to the City and County.
<br />
<br />** Option No. 5 reflects cost sharing if the City were to participate in the
<br />County's Koehler plant and its expansion from 4 to 8 MGD and the diversion
<br />facilities with the City gaining 1.33 MGD capacity.
<br />
<br />In the ensuing discussion of this report and the options presented, it was pointed out that
<br />
<br />the Public Service Authority's Koehler Treatment Plant was designed to treat industrial
<br />
|