Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1~ <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />OCTOBER 25, 1983 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Council accepted Mr. Crews' and the study committee's recommendations and, therefore, <br /> <br />accepted the minimum premium plan proposed by Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Southwestern <br /> <br />Virginia and, too, terminated coverage (effective October 31, 1983) heretofore carried <br /> <br />with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. (NOTE: Subsequent to Council's fore- <br /> <br />going action, the City School Board, on October 27, 1983, accepted the plan proposed by <br /> <br />BC-BS of Southwestern Virginia.) <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />In tentative acceptance of the Planning Commission's recommendation that Lot No. 28 at <br /> <br />802 Starling Avenue be rezoned from "R-6 Residential" to "P-2 Professional", as <br /> <br />requested by Mr. James M. Wilson, Council unanimously called for a duly-advertised <br /> <br />public hearing to be conducted on this recommendation and request at Council's forth- <br /> <br />coming November 8th meeting. <br /> <br />By letter of petition, Mr. Charles E. Williams requested that penalties and interest be <br /> <br />waived on unpaid 1972 real estate taxes assessed against his property (Lot No.6, <br /> <br />Section A) at 1050 Graves Street. The record notes that Mr. Williams acquired this <br /> <br />property in 1954 and that, in October of 1962, ownership passed from Mr. Williams and <br /> <br />his wife, Ida D. Williams, solely to Mrs. Williams, from whom Mr. Williams separated <br /> <br />in 1966. The record further notes that, by deed dated December 31, 1971, and recorded <br /> <br />January 10,1972, a "deed of gift" made Mr. Williams the sole owner of this property; <br /> <br />however, the billing for taxes for the year 1972 was in the name of Mrs. Williams, <br /> <br />inasmuch as she was the owner of record as of January 1, 1972, and for reasons unknown <br /> <br />said taxes (in the amount of $93.58) have never been paid. After some discussion, in <br /> <br />which Councilman Reed took the position that Council should not involve itself in this <br /> <br />matter (inasmuch as the taX delinquency apparently resulted from a domestic problem <br /> <br />between Mr. Williams and his wife) and in which Councilmember Severt expressed concern <br />