My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 07/25/1983
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1983
>
Minutes 07/25/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2006 4:32:25 PM
Creation date
11/28/2006 3:52:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
7/25/1983
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MONDAY <br /> <br />1 i <br /> <br />JULY 25, 1983 <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />As a result, there was unanimous opinion among Council and the City <br />Administration to proceed with Phase II-A at a cost of $131,899. <br /> <br />In April, 1980, the legal firm of McGuire, Woods & Battle was <br />selected as Bond Counsel. <br /> <br />In June, 1980, Council selected Wheat First Securities, Blythe, <br />Eastman, Paine, Webber, Inc., and Saloman Brothers to serve as <br />Financial Advisors and ultimately to do the Bond Underwriting. <br /> <br />What was it that persuaded Council to "stay the course"? <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I remember when the $40 million price tag was first mentioned and <br />Francis West started shaking his head. (You see, Francis usually <br />deals in just one million at a time.) Beside the price tag, there <br />were philosophical differences on Council (Private vs Public Power). <br /> <br />Again, why did we stay with it? <br /> <br />The subject itself is tough! We tried to grasp the meaning of such <br />electrical terms as Demand, Megawatt, Peaking and Ratchet. In <br />addition, the financing plan was new to most of us. (Ask Barry <br />Greene to explain Ramped Capitalized Interest Concept to you or <br />try "Arbitrage" on your neighbor.) <br /> <br />We pressed on because there was a world-wide energy shortage and <br />Appalachian publicly stated that it might have to ration. To off- <br />set its own capacity shortage, Appalachian planned to build two <br />coal-fired plants. The construction costs of these plants (due to <br />the environmental problems) would push Appalachian's rates upward. <br />In addition, water power is a renewable source of power. <br /> <br />Let me tell you what this present 80-year-old plant has meant to <br />you and me. In the past 8 years (including '83-'84) by June 1984, <br />we will have transferred $6,265,803 from the Electric Fund to the <br />General Fund. ..an average of $783,225 per year. This is the equiv- <br />alent of 24~i per $100 in our property tax rate. We would have <br />been paying $1.00 today, instead of 76i. These are the actual <br />figures. The $850,000 that we have spent, translated into real <br />estate tax rate, has cost us between 3i and 4i per $100 on an annual <br />basis ($850,000 + 8 years = $106,250 per year). The Electric Fund <br />today has $1.9 million in Escrow and a forecast surplus for 6/30/84 <br />of $1.8 million. All this from our 1.0 megawatt plant. Ridgeway <br />was slated to be a 20 megawatt plant (20 times our present plant). <br /> <br />In addition, in the early days of this project, one study predicted <br />that the new lake would attract 1 million visitors per year. <br />Multiply this by any number of dollars you choose and you can apprec- <br />iate what this might have meant to the area. <br /> <br />These numbers are familar to some of you. They are repeated to <br />emphasize the significance of the decision that Council must make. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.