Laserfiche WebLink
<br />''.} , <br />lJ " <br /> <br />MONDAY <br /> <br />APRIL 30, 1984 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />The budget as now prepared envisions transferring out from the Electric <br />Department $1,775,000, almost $500,000 from surplus. While, to a lesser <br />degree, we budgeted a similar transfer last year, the current estimates <br />would appear to make the budgeted transfer from surplus necessary. The <br />City Manager's August 31, 1983, memorandum which, updated, shows a <br />$2,030,000 projected Leatherwood Creek water cost which nets out at <br />$1,530,000 projected expense after a deduction of $500,000 from water <br />surplus. Moreover, this memorandum alludes to $3,764,500 (1995 dollars) <br />for projection of Electric Department capital needs. <br /> <br />Let me point out now that we have what appears about $2 Million in the <br />Ridgeway Escrow Account and about $2~ Million surplus in the Regular <br />Electric Department. This, to me, raises the question of why we should <br />borrow heavily for water and sewer - thus raising rates _ when we have <br />money on hand. We have already raised water rates, and sewer rate <br />increases of up to 20% have been discussed. These rate increases will <br />not only "sock it to industry" but to every citizen of Martinsville who <br />has already borne a recent substantial water rate increase. Industry <br />is the large user and this in turn jeopardizes to some extent the <br />favorable "industry climate" Martinsville has always attempted to pro- <br />ject. It could be hurtful to our present industry and a road-block to <br />future industry. Keeping water and sewer rates low protects jobs in the <br />industries we now have and those we hope to attract. I can't find a <br />compelling reason not to use a large chunk of the $2 Million Escrow <br />Account to pay for water and sewer expansion and improvements. <br /> <br />As to the projected capital improvements for the Electric Department, I <br />believe these funds could be accrued year-in and year-out in the future <br />from our Electric Department profits; these accruals to add to the cur- <br />rent $2~ Million surplus. <br /> <br />I suggest, then, the Council <br /> <br />(1) Consider the budget unbalanced by nearly $500,000.00; <br /> <br />(2) Declare the escrow money to pay for water and sewer <br />improvements and, therefore, stave off the planned <br />rate increases; and <br /> <br />(3) Use the Electric Department surplus to pay for future <br />expansion and improvements of the Electric Department <br />and eliminate the transfer of nearly $500,000 surplus <br />to the General Fund. <br /> <br />As is his want, the City Manager has prepared a scholarly and profes- <br />sional budget message as well as a thoughtful budget. I've always taken <br />the position that he ought to make the appropriate recommendations for <br />budget cutting to meet a desired goal. Some of the areas I might sug- <br />gest that he and the Council look to for the $500,000 are: <br /> <br />(1) Prison Fund - It is anticipated that the Prison Fund will <br />show a profit this year of $195,420 and a loss next year of <br />$41,586. The major reason for the difference is recovered <br />costs - prison farm. This year's revenue is $589,385. Bud- <br />get for next year is $381,905, a decrease of $207,480. Sug- <br />gest that the City Manager be asked to recompute this. <br />