My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 01/10/1984
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1984
>
Minutes 01/10/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2006 2:35:28 PM
Creation date
11/16/2006 10:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
1/10/1984
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2~ <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />JANUARY 10, 1984 <br /> <br />_. <br /> <br />From Option 2 of the County's Table presented 12/19/83, it appears that <br />the P.S.A.'s Marrowbone option for the south County is less cost effective <br />than the County's proposed buy-in to the City's plant expansion. However, <br />it is unclear if the P.S.A. pump stations required to deliver the P.S.A. <br />flow to the City's plant from the south would offset the higher Marrow- <br />bone treatment costs. <br /> <br />The City and P.S.A. need to provide for the orderly expansion of both <br />existing plants through a new wastewater treatment agreement. The City <br />could find itself expanding its plant unilaterally and then at a later <br />date selling a portion of the capacity expansion at a depressed historical <br />cost. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Also, the diversion of the Jones Creek flow and corresponding buy-in to <br />the existing Upper Smith Plant offers the City relief from excessive flows <br />approximately 6 months sooner than the proposed expansion improvements at <br />the City plant, exclusive of negotiations with the Henry County Public <br />Service Authority. <br /> <br />Based on all of the above discussion and the similarity of the unit costs <br />appearing in Tables 1 and 2, it appears that the City should seek to con- <br />tinue negotiations with the Henry County Public Service Authority for the <br />purpose of purchasing a portion of the capacity of the Upper Smith Plant <br />at Koehler. Due to the present volume of flow at the City's plant, nego- <br />tiations should be carried out and concluded without delay. If, however, <br />as a result of these negotiations the buy-in costs increase, the City's <br />share of the projected annual operation and maintenance costs at the Upper <br />Smith Plant is determined to be excessive, or if in general, a mutually <br />acceptable diversion scheme cannot be resolved, unilateral expansion of <br />the City's plant remains a viable alternative. <br /> <br />In response to several inquiries, Mr. Crush indicated that the odor-control improvements <br /> <br />proposed for the City's treatment plant could be completed in approximately sixteen months <br /> <br />(from date authorization is given to prepare plans and specifications) and (that) the cost <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />of constructing pumping stations and/or force mains or gravity-flow mains to divert prin- <br /> <br />cipally industrial flow from the City's Jones Creek Interceptor to the PSA's Koehler <br /> <br />(Upper Smith River) treatment plant is estimated to be $386,000.00. Appearing before <br /> <br />Council and speaking on behalf of citizens residing in the Forest Park area of the City, <br /> <br />in addition to their counsel (Mr. Benjamin R. Gardner, Attorney at Law), were Mr. Frank T. <br /> <br />Gravely (of 1610 Mulberry Road) and Mr. Donald G. Hogg (of 1604 Meadow View Lane) who <br /> <br />reiterated previously-expressed concerns with--and objections to--the offensive odors <br /> <br />which have emanated from the City's treatment plant for the last several years (until <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.