Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 <br /> <br />---- <br /> <br />Minter's March 23rd letter to local realtors, in which letter Mr. Minter cited an <br /> <br />authoritative interpretation of State guidelines or taxing statutes which now <br /> <br />permit, for local license taxation, requiring a local license not only from real <br /> <br />estate brokers but also from their respective agents, where such agents are not <br /> <br />classified as employees but as independent contractors. Mr. Minter also reported <br /> <br />that he has received no adverse reaction from the several real estate brokers he has <br /> <br />contacted on this matter and, too, that adequate record-keeping procedures are <br /> <br />already in place. Appearing before Council, in connection with this matter, were <br /> <br />. <br />Messrs. Roger L. Young (of The Young Company) and A. C. Hall (of A. C. Hall, <br /> <br />Realtor), local realtors, who expressed no real opposition to the proposed licensing <br /> <br />separately of real estate brokers and their agents who are independent contractors, <br /> <br />inasmuch as (as pointed out by Mr. Minter) there would be no "double" taxation; <br /> <br />however, Mr. Hall did note the fact that real estate independent contractors incur <br /> <br />expenses or costs which independent contractors in other fields do not incur. At <br /> <br />Council's request, Mr. Minter agreed to defer the mailing of license tax appli- <br /> <br />cations (scheduled to be mailed May 1st) to local realtors and their independent <br /> <br />contractors until immediately after Council's next regular meeting (to be held May <br /> <br />12th) in order that this matter, with Mr. Minter's explanation, might be considered <br /> <br />by the full Council (i.e., when Mr. Groden and all other members can be present). <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />Council took the following actions on the following staff reports: <br /> <br />A. Acknowledged receipt of a statement reflecting balances of all funds, <br />as of March 31, 1987; <br /> <br />B. Acknowledged receipt of a (quarterly) financial report for the <br />nine-month period ended March 31, 1987; <br /> <br />C. Acknowledged and discussed an updated report on the City's Water <br />Pollution Control (Sewage) Treatment Plant expansion, which report is <br />made a part of the minutes of this meeting as an addendum thereto; <br /> <br />D. Acknowledged receipt of notice that the local Circuit Court has <br />recently ruled in favor of the Tultex Corporation, as plaintiff, in <br />its civil action (based on a claim of tax-exempt status) against the <br />City of Martinsville for recovery of some $25,000.00 paid by Tultex to <br />the City as taxes (assessed by the City's Commissioner of the Revenue) <br />