Laserfiche WebLink
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 <br /> <br /> ADDENDLM <br /> <br />(City Manager Brown's.conclusions and recommendations from his report dated <br />February 14, 1989, entitled, "Report and Recommendation on Housing Policy and <br />Program for the City", hereinbefore referred to) <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Any time that a community experiences a noticeable decline in general <br />population, as well as in school-age population, there should be genuine <br />concern as to the reasons for such change. Even though the size of families is <br />decreasing and the general population is older, a reduction in population or <br />even a stagnation in population growth is evidence that conditions exist that <br />are in need of addressing which may relate to the economy of the area or to <br />policies and regulations that do not provide the opportunity or climate that <br />would serve to encourage the construction of new housing in the community. A <br />fairly large number of housing units have been construct'ed in Martinsville over <br />the last decade, however, a fairly large number also have been demolished due <br />to public improvements and general deterioration. Even though the demand for <br />housing is driven primarily by new jobs and income level, it is my belief that <br />additional housing units in all income levels, particularly single family, <br />could be marketed if streets are opened and lots are made available at <br />reasonable costs and a reasonable plan for financing housing units for low and <br />moderate income people is made available. There is land available that can be <br />developed for housing, though much of it is located in areas of steep grades. <br />It seems to me that the lack of subdivided lots is the prime impediment to <br />construction of houses for medium and higher income persons. In the case of <br />the very low, low, and moderate income groups the problem is centered around <br />affordability and this is related to both housing costs and income. In <br />attempting to properly address the housing question a position or policy should <br />be developed applicable to these two major income groups, low/moderate and <br />medium/high income levels: therefore, the thoughts and recommendations set <br />forth in this report are predicated on this delineation of income levels. <br /> <br />Even though sometimes disregarded or ignored, the condition and well-being of <br />the existing housing stock in the City is extremely vital to meeting the <br />housing needs of a community. It is disheartening to observe the loss of <br />housing through deterioration resulting in a probable loss in population, <br />especially if owned by occupants who are unable, because of very low income to <br />maintain or rehabilitate their residences. It is almost equally disconcerting <br />to have situations wherein the owners of rental property are unable to justify <br />the upgrading of such property to acceptable standards because of their <br />inability to charge and collect enough rent from low income people to pay for <br />the required improvements over a reasonable period. Thus, it is imperative <br />that everything possible be done to encourage and promote the upgrading and <br />maintenance to proper standards of existing housing units, whether they are <br />owner occupied or rental units. <br /> <br /> <br />