Laserfiche WebLink
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 1988 <br /> <br /> noted no increase or decrease in the "Commonwealth. & L~caI <br /> Education" Revenue. <br /> <br /> We noted a minor problem in the category of Local <br />Revenues. which are forecast. other than "l',lew T.a;: Revenue" to <br />increase by only $88,715 or 1%. In his memorandum dated <br />April 8, 1988. Mr. Brown indicated that the Commissioner of <br />Revenue anticipated that the 1988 General Reassessment would <br />increase by 7 to 10 percent and that Finance Director Dick <br />Fitts estimated that, at current ta:{ rates, ·this reassessment <br />would result in an increase in revenue from this source of <br />$198,888 in FY89/90 over FY88/89. 'We also noted that the <br />Petsone. 1 Propert~ Tax revenue for FY88/89 was recently <br />reported to be around $122,000 more than the amount included <br />in the Budget. We question whether this factor was <br />considered in the Local Revenue Forecast. We suspect that <br />other additional Local Revenue incree~ses may also have <br />been overlooked. <br /> <br /> We raise these points because we are concerned <br />that, in preparing the Five Year Borecast, the City <br />Administration may not have been-totall~ diligent in <br />lettering out every reasonably anticipated increase in local <br />revenues from existing revenue sources and, therefore, ma~ <br />have painted a somewhat unrealistically pessimistic picture <br />of revenues anticipated for FY89/90 from currently a':ailable <br />BOUFC es. <br /> <br /> The ma~or difference in General Ft:nd Revenues <br />between FY88/89 and FY89/90 appea~s, however, in the <br />"Miscellaneous" category' which is down b~ $926,785 or ~7%. <br />Mr. Brown has explained this decrease will result from the <br />elimination of the $515,205 transfer from the Water Fund to <br />the General Fund, the-elimination of the $251,512 transfer <br />from the Sewer Fund to the General Fund,.'and the reduction of <br />the'$1,652,270 transfer from the Electric Fund in FY88/89 to <br />a $1,250,000 transfer in FY89/90, or a total reduction in <br />transfers of $926,785. We believe that this reduction and <br />these eliminations of t~ansfers give rise to the first <br />philosophical question Council must address: What is the <br />reason for the existence of the "Enterprise Funds"? <br /> <br />The Enterprise Funds <br /> <br /> The Enterprise Funds provide to our citizens <br />essential services - electricitV, water and sewer - which <br />could be provided by private enterprise or an independent <br />authority, such as the P.S.A., but which the City has chosen <br />to provide. The rationale for the City to provide these <br />services could be that the City desired to provide these <br />services at the lowest cost to its citizens and that it, <br />therefore. chose to provide these services rather than rely <br />on private enterprise with its profit motive or on another <br />layer of government L~.~,,~_,a~,,. Or the rationale could be <br /> <br /> <br />