Laserfiche WebLink
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 1988 <br /> <br />withdrawal of PSA participation in our plant-and the Five <br />Year Forecast figures show an unexplained'increase in revenue <br />'in those Vears. Both sets of figures show transfers to the <br />General Fund for both funds terminating with FYSB/Ge. <br /> <br /> Again, here, the question arises as to whether the <br /> intention is to provide water and sewer service generating a <br /> net profit to offset other expenses of City Government or <br /> not. As was said before. historically both Funds have <br />generated a profit and, while the attachments to the April <br /> 27, 1988 memo do not show it, it is our recollection that <br /> transfers of around a total of $400,000 to $500,000 - they <br /> amount to $544,515 for FY88/89 - have been made.from these <br /> Funds to the General Fund since at'least FY86/87. In our <br /> opinion this has been a proper practice and Sewer and Water <br /> rates should be'adjusted beginning in FY89/90 to allow the <br /> practice of transfers in approximately this amount to <br /> continue in the future. Mr. Brown noted in his memo <br /> forwarding the Five Year Forecast that a rate increase of 18% <br /> in the Sewer Fund and 15% in the Water Fund would be <br /> required for these results. While we believe that some <br /> reduction from the estimated increase in expenditures in the. <br />'Water and Sewer Funds could be achieved through greater <br /> efficiency, excluding the large specified. e,~penditures (i.e. <br /> the storage tank and piping, the water main to the tanks, the <br /> 4 MGD Capacit~ in the Lower Smith River Interceptor>, the <br /> expenditure increases in these funds over the next two years <br /> is modest. (In the Sewer Fund from FYGS/89 to FYGe/90 4.6% <br /> and-from FY89/90 to FY90/e15. 4% and in the Water Fund from <br /> FY88/89 to FY89/90 4% and from FY89/90 to FY90/91 less than <br /> 1%.) Therefore, we believe onl~, modest reductions could be <br /> achieved. <br /> <br /> On the other hand,'we note that, without an'~ rate <br /> increase, the revenues'in the Water Fund are projected to be <br /> flat.over the next five years which fa~t indicates that water <br /> consumption is pro~ected to be flat over the per'iod. Under <br /> these circumstances we seriously OL.estion the necessity of an <br /> additional water storage tank and piping and a new main to <br /> the tanks for a total cost of ~476 r>r~o over the nex~ t~o <br /> years. <br /> <br />Summary - Enterprise Funds <br /> <br /> We believe that the Enterprise Funds can, and <br />should, generate sufficient net profit either through <br />increased efficiency or increased rates to continue their <br />contributions to the General Fund at the FY88/87 level, thus <br />eliminating the $926,785 revenue decline in the General Fund <br />shown on the Five Year Forecast between FY88/89 and FY89/90. <br />As consumption of electricity and use of water and sewer <br />increase moderately in the remaining years of the Forecast <br />period, we would expect net profits of these Funds to <br />increase modestly and that the contribut ons from these Funds <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />