Laserfiche WebLink
TUESDAY, MAY 3, 1988 <br /> <br />Do we currently have.on hand the money to pay for this budget? <br />Yes, we do. But, at this rate of decline how many years will it <br />take to wipe out the total unappropriated surplus in these funds <br />of $4,398,333 after Fiscal Year 1988-19897 Something less than <br />two years, even with the assumption that no increase in <br />expenditures in excess of revenue increases will occur during this <br />period, an assumption which would seem ridiculously optimistic in <br />light of the school s~tuation and other recent history. <br /> <br />At $39,000 per 1¢. of increase in the real estate tax rate, just <br />how much increase in real estate tax rate would be necessary to <br />eliminate a $2.7 million decline? 70¢/$100 of assessment or <br />nearly double our current tax rate would be required. That <br />increase would mean a total real estate tax rate of $1.46/$100 of <br />assessment, higher than all other cities in Virginia except <br />Manassas Park, Petersburg and Richmond. We could, of course, <br />obtain the money through garbage fees or other fees instead of <br />real estate taxes, but the end result would be the same; our <br />citizens would have $2.7 million fewer dollars to spend as they <br />saw fit because the City would have spent it for them. <br /> <br />Admittedly a number of wealthy people live in Martinsville and <br />others of our citizens have good, high paying jobs. But many, <br />many of our citizens are retired on less than adequate pensions or <br />are employed in modestly compensated. factory production <br />positions. These people simply cannot afford to have the taxes <br />and/or fees imposed upon them by the City virtually doubled. <br /> <br />The School people, when they were here before us, made the cogent <br />argument that if we hope to attract new industry and business to <br />the City we must offer quality public education. While I agree <br />with this position, we must, at the same time, not force all the <br />young families with school age children to locate in the County, <br />unless they are already wealthy, because the cost of living in the <br />City is simply prohibitive. Little industry will be attracted to <br />a city, regardless of how good its schools are, if the industry <br />has to pay its employees wages so high that its costs render it <br />non-competitive just so its employees can afford to live where <br />they work. <br /> <br />The Council has already voted fullfunding for the School Board <br />budget and has been editorially praised for this action by the <br />Martinsville Bulletin. But, in light of the situation in which we <br />find ourselves, I believe as representatives of all of our <br />citizens, we must require of our City Administration and our <br />School Administration, in the future, a higher degree of <br />management than they have exhibited in the past. And, by <br />management, I mean the ability to do more with less. On C-span <br />the other night, Mayor Wilson Goode of Philadelphia acknowledged <br />that, in a time of decreasing Federal and State aid to cities, <br />this type of management is the challenge of all city <br />administrations today. A similar sentiment was contained in <br />Governor Baliles' letter to Delegate Reynolds dated March 29, <br /> <br /> <br />