My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 03/30/1988
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1988
>
Minutes 03/30/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2000 10:00:29 PM
Creation date
6/25/1999 2:19:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
3/30/1988
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 1988 <br /> <br />If all three of my recommendations with regard to amending the Enterprise Fund <br />transfers were adopted the net increase in General Fund Revenue would be $398,800 <br />for a total General Fund ReVenue, without any Contribution from Surplus, of <br />$19,815,897. If the total anticipated General Fund Surplus of $1,766,793 were <br />added to this revenue figure, the total available General Fund would be <br />$21,582,690. Total recommended General Fund Expenditures, however, amount to <br />$21,923,365, which would cause a shortfall of $340,675 without any major <br />contingency reserve. If we were to adopt Mr. Brown's minimum recommended major <br />contingency reserve of $500,000, the total shortfall would be $840,675 or 4% of <br />the total General Fund Budget. <br /> <br />When faced with such a shortfall an individual or a business - and I believe a <br />government - has three options: (1) increase revenues, (2) decrease expenditures, <br />or (3) a'l'combination of both. Mr. Brown has provided several suggestionsI"for <br />increasing revenues. I, for one, cannot support any of his suggestions, other <br />than increasing the sewer and water rates for the reasons I specified earlier, <br />until I am convinced that every possible reduction in expenditures has been made. <br /> <br />The Budget as presented does not convince me that every possible reduction'has <br />been made. In fact, in a cursory review of Mr. Brown's budget message I found <br />$232,000 of proposed expenditures which could be eliminated without altering the' <br />proposed compensation adjustments, without eliminating any positions and without <br />negatively affecting the level of service currently provided by the City. I am <br />sure a more careful scrutiny of the proposed budget would reveal further <br />reductions which could be made. <br /> <br />One final note. The proposed Budget reflects a General Fund Surplus of $1,766,793 <br />at June 30, 1988. Our Budget as adopted last year projected a General Fund <br />surplus of only $507,001 at June 30, 1988. Thus, through the careful and frugal <br />management of Mr. Brown and all of the City department heads and other employees, <br />$1,259,792 of money which was appropriated was not expended. For this I believe <br />Mr. Brown and his staff should be congratulated. And I also believe that this <br />savings should be used to benefit the citizens of this City and could be freely <br />employed in FY 88-89. My only objection is to Expenditures which are proposed to <br />exceed General Fund Revenues by more than this amount. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.