My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda 02/09/1999
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Agendas
>
1999
>
Agenda 02/09/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2000 10:00:28 PM
Creation date
2/22/1999 8:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/9/1999
City Council - Category
Agendas
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. 222 <br />THURSDAY, JANUARY 21, 1999 <br /> <br />that many communities his firm has studied and worked with could not support such debt without tax <br />increases, and that the analysis clearly indicated that Martinsville is not only in a strong financial and debt <br />position currently, but that the City would remain extremely competitive even if it assumed the level of debt <br />proposed to meet its needs. Mr. Rose then stated that the role of his firm was to provide the information and <br />tangible tools Martinsville needed to do the things the community needed to do. Vice-Mayor Teague then <br />noted that the figures on the Debt Ratio graph did not reflect Meals Tax funds within self support figures. <br />Mr. Rose stated that since this is a dedicated revenue item it is not pledged as part of the full faith and credit <br />of the City, versus the Real Estate property tax, which is part of the full faith and credit pledge. Mr. Rose <br />went on to show the City's very low debt, its relatively low fund balance, and the fact that some expenditure <br />areas were higher than average. Vice-Mayor Teague pointed out the comparatively low fund balance figure <br />as a potential problem. Mr. Reynolds responded1 that the comparison information illustrated the fact that <br />some communities chose to finance projects through debt and were able to retain monies to create fund <br />balances, as opposed to expending cash reserves to pay for projects, thus showing low fund balances and <br />commensurately low debt obligation, in a pay-as-you-go manner. Mr. Reynolds stated that Martinsville had <br />typically used in-house funds for projects in the past, resulting in both a low debt ratio and a low fund <br />balance. Mr. Rose added that as a city Maztinsville had been able to accomplish more with limited resources <br />than virtually any other jurisdiction of its size in the comparison group, and stated that the bond rating <br />agencies would see tax levels that were competitive now and would remain so, while the City was fully able <br />to do key projects through debt financing. In addition, Mr. Rose noted that the potential for interest earnings <br />on cash held in reserve can also contribute to the advantage of capital debt financing. <br /> <br /> Further discussion then occurred regarding representations of the City' s General Fund health and <br />fund balances, funds held in escrow for landfill closure and post-closure, tax exempt finance rates, and <br />arbitrage earnings potential. Council Member Roop pointed out that it was likely that some of the other <br />localities in the comparison analysis had funded projects using local reserves, not debt financing, and still <br />had strong fund balances. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.