Laserfiche WebLink
TUESDAY, APRll, 28, 1998 <br /> <br />been within its rights to tow Mr. Crutchfield' s vehicle and was told that it had been. It was then agreed that Mr. <br /> <br />Reynolds would meet with Mr. Crutchfield to review the issue and take appropriate action, as necessary. <br /> <br />Under items not on the A~genda, Mayor Adams noted that he had received an invitation from the <br />Jamestown/Yorktown Foundation to participate in a planning session for their celebration in 2007, which he passed <br />on to Mr. Reynolds. The Mayor also noted that there were eleven board appointments that would require Council <br />Action between now and June 1998. The Mayor also asked about the need for Council to meet to begin planning <br />for their upcoming Fall Retreat. Council Member Haskell asked whether any items in Council' s most recent <br />Strategic Work Plan were addressed in the upcoming budget, and was told by the Mayor that some were. Vice- <br />Mayor Crabtree suggested that Council consider a Work Session following Budget approval. Mr. Reynolds, in <br />response to a question from Council Member Haskell, stated that Council might wish to consider holding their <br />Retreat at a different time this year, to better coincide with the Joint Council/Staff Work Session. Council Member <br />Haskell then asked what the impact of the State' s Personal Property Tax Repeal Program on local government <br />revenues might be in the coming year. Mr. Ronnie Minter, Commissioner of the Revenue, stated his understanding <br />of this issue and how the State might administer the program, noting that the localities would continue to assess and <br />collect revenues, report their figures to the State, and the State would then reimburse vehicle owners. Both Mr. <br />lV~nter and Mr. Bartlett agreed that in years to come this change would probably cost local governments revenue. <br />Mr. Minter stated that there were still a lot of unknowns about the administration of the new program. Coundl <br />Member Teague encouraged all involved to be sure and carefully track all local administrative costs and lost <br />revenue as the situation developed. <br /> <br />Council next considered the need to meet in Executive Session. In accordance with Section 2.1-344 (A) of <br />the CODE OF VIRGINIA (1950, and as amended) and upon motion, duly seconded, and by unanimous <br />recorded vote, Council convened in Executive Session for the purpose of discussing the following matters: <br />(A.) Personnel matters under the jurisdiction of City Council, as authorized by Subsection 1; (B.) Possible <br /> <br /> <br />