My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 05/23/1972
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1972
>
Minutes 05/23/1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2006 4:15:05 PM
Creation date
12/20/2006 3:55:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
5/23/1972
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />l-l <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />MAY 23, 1972 <br /> <br />objections thereto, citing an 1891 map in support of the fact that Lester <br /> <br />Street has been a matter of record for many years and its name of historical <br /> <br />basis and, further, the adverse effect a changing of its name would have <br /> <br />upon legal records. After some discussion, Council directed that a <br /> <br />duly-advertised public hearing be conducted on this proposal at Council's <br /> <br />forthcoming June 27th meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. J. W. Jones, III, on behalf of himself and some twenth-eight other <br /> <br />owners and/or tenants of residential properties in the Cleveland Avenue- <br /> <br />Brown Street area, appeared before Council--along with many of these <br /> <br />citizens--and registered certain objections to the proposed locating of <br /> <br />a Regional Probation House in the area, specifically at the southwest <br /> <br />corner of Cleveland Avenue and Brown Street. Furthermore, these <br /> <br />citizens--through Mr. Jones--requested Council to rescind its action taken <br /> <br />during its April 25th meeting wherein it conditionally agreed to appropriate <br /> <br />funds in the City's 1972-73 budget as the City's share of the cost of staff <br /> <br />salaries and, thus, approved the project in principle only, inasmuch as <br /> <br />the Council has no jurisdiction as to location so long as it complies with <br /> <br />zoning regulations. Other objections raised by the petitioners pertained <br /> <br />to traffic congestion and the anticipated increase thereof, the cost of <br /> <br />purchasing and renovating the property (in which Council was apprised that <br /> <br />no public funds are involved), and certain anticipated environmental <br /> <br />conditions. Petitioners, however, indicated their hearty support of such <br /> <br /> <br />a project in principle and their willingness to assist in selecting a <br /> <br /> <br />location for same which would be feasible and would have the consent--as to <br /> <br /> <br />location--of surrounding property owners. The Honorable J. English Ford, <br /> <br />Judge of the Sixth Regional Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court, who--along <br /> <br />with interested citizens--appeared before Council on said April 25th and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.