Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SG <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 10, 1970 <br /> <br />might be served by the City's Mulberry Creek Sewer Outfall Line, and with <br /> <br />reference to the request for sewer service for Tan Bark Place Subdivision, as <br /> <br />filed October 13, 1970, by Rives S. Brown, Realtor, City Manager Noland and <br /> <br />Public Works Director Brown filed the following report and recommendations <br /> <br />which Council unanimously accepted, thus authorizing sewer service for Tan <br /> <br />Bark place Subdivision upon the conditions set forth in said report: <br /> <br />In accordance with Council's recent directive, this is an attempt to <br />place in perspective, and suggest a policy with regard to Tan Bark Place <br />as a specific situation, and for the area of which Tan Bark Place is a <br />part. <br /> <br />The Rives S. Brown Company's letter, read at the recent Council meeting, <br />outlined the history of this situation as well as the reason for the <br />current problem. It seems clear that the Company developed this property <br />in accordance with the terms of the City's ordinance and policy covering <br />such development but that the problem arises because of an apparent <br />change in State Health Department policy, during the time the subdivision <br />development was being completed. So, the question is, on what basis might <br />the developer and the City equitably share in the cost of installing a <br />sanitary sewer line to take the place of individual septic tanks which <br />had been originally contemplated but now no longer possible, as we under- <br />stand the situation. <br /> <br />Topograph and/or existing or proposed land use development are the deter- <br />mining factors in the location of a gravity type sanitary sewer line, and <br />these were the determinants when the Mulberry Creek Interceptor was <br />designed and installed, as a part of the City's overall and long range <br />sewerage system development plan. Accordingly, when the City installed <br />the Mulberry Creek Interceptor, to serve areas inside the City limits, it <br />was necessary that a major portion of the total distance of the line be <br />placed outside the City limits. However, this topographic necessity added <br />a relatively vast area to the line's potential, a factor taken into con- <br />sideration in its design. It would be practical, then, to install future <br />branches of the Mulberry Creek Interceptor to serve areas on the north and <br />south sides of Route 58 East, extending to the Mt. Olivet section of the <br />north side of Route 58, some little distance outside the City limits. <br /> <br />Because of the relative area potential of the Mulberry Creek Interceptor is <br />so vast, and because so little is known about any plans for development of <br />areas which might need to use this interceptor, it seems logical to confine <br />the present consideration to the Tank Bark Place problem. <br /> <br />The terrain surrounding the street the developers are calling Tan Bark <br />Place indicates that the subdivider is developing this particular area to <br />its practical maximum, which justifies their statement that the installation <br />of a line to connect the lots fronting on Tan Bark Place with the Mulberry <br />Creek Interceptor would be too costly for economic amortization from Tan <br />Bark Place alone. <br />